Search results

I think the Sage is doing a great job. Sure he may be off the odd time, but it's still better to have official answers to refer to rather than internet answers with no official clout. Think what a mess the game would be in if there was no support/clarification for the rules as written. I think...

D&D girls wearing chainmail bikinis and serving drinks!

I've got a LN monk who has never defined his character's code of honour. Basically, the player never made a code so he wouldn't have to abide by one. It's a good campaign and he wants to be evil so I'm finding that he is regularly crossing the line into evil. I want to make a code of honour so...

This is a good reason for BBEGs to try and get something (special ability or magic item) that allows them to re-roll a save once per day. It comes in really handy when a 1 really screws you over.

I'm looking for something to base a LN monk's code of honour on. Any (online) suggestions?

But that still leaves the possibility of running up to the BBEG and casting it to trap him in the hemisphere with you. And if the party does this as a group, the BBEG will find himself cut off from his allies and trapped inside a hemisphere with an entire party of adventurers.

Just out of curiousity, would allowing the dispel chance to be increased really be that bad a thing? IMO, increasing the 1d4 round duration is not worth it whereas the chance definitely would be. It is a metamagic feat afterall (and is burning a higher level spell slot).

IMC, when the party gets attacked by some mooks who pose no challenge I just skip ahead and say the mooks were killed/defeated. It saves a lot of time. It also prevents blood-thirsty players from side-tracking just to take on some mooks.

If I can make a suggestion, why not eliminate the raiding parties element and just make one big surprise attack that overwhelms the frontier defenses due to the lack of warning. That would heighten the sense of urgency as there wouldn't be an army on standby and it would take time to muster the...

You may want to find out if your players want to play this type of campaign. In the past, I've found players don't like having superiors to report to or orders that they're expected to follow...

In terms of type of bonus, if there's nothing listed then its an unspecified bonus and it stacks.

I don't have a problem with min-maxing per se; it's when someone can't rationalize why their character is the way they are other than b/c the rules say they can do it. Or when the rationalization is so incredible that it's obvious it's just an excuse to min/max.

Are ghosts solid on the ethereal plane? How do they appear different?

Ahh, good point. The Y might get only two attacks, but they'll be at his full attack bonus.

OK, I just thought of this earlier today. Here's the scenario: Character X has mobility and is mid-level. Character Y is a tough fighter-type and is high-level. X and Y are engaged in melee within 5 feet of each other. Neither are using a reach weapon. Wouldn't it be a tactical advantage for...

Yeah, but even with high speeds someone can usually still reach you with charge attacks (and then potential AoOs if you try to move away again).

Thanks for the links. Here's one more with a lot of werecreatures: http://www.goldenwolfen.com/archive/index.cgi?page=0

That archer better be moving around...

Don't know if this exists already or not, but I'd like to start a thread with links to good picture sites (especially character/monster piks, medieval locations, etc.). I've got several at home that I'll post later but for now here's a link to the WotC character portraits...

But how do you address the rogue who carries around a dozen daggers so every hit he can leave it embedded? The target is gunna spend all his time pulling out daggers! Additionally, having a weapon embedded in you might be better than pulling it out (re: blood loss). Nifty idea though.