Search results

Harpies are definitely buzzards, or vultures. (Buzzard is a weird term in ornithology.) But they have other baggage you may not want. Honestly, if you want the carrion-bird-humanoid, you use tengu/kenku. Or Vrocks. I suspect the existing stats don't really reflect what you want them for -...

The idea is to protect the book that the wizard carries around. If the book is supposed to stay on the table, glyph of warding works fine. But if you pick the book up it goes off.

I'm placing a wizard's spellbook in my dungeon, and just noticed that there don't seem to be trap spells any more. Explosive Runes, which has been moved under Glyph of Warding, specifically can't be placed on objects designed to be moved. Even Arcane Lock seems to make using it on a book...

How do you guys narrate auto-saves anyway? From a rules-fairness POV, you want to imply to the players that this is a special, limited use ability separate from "Wow, he just rolls really well".

Well, easy enough in a "balanced encounter? what is this balanced encounter you speak of?" way.

It's simple, guys. A halberd is a kind of cleaver on a stick. A glaive is a five-pointed switchblade throwing star thingy that is only outmatched by the power of love.

What if we make it a LG society that "reeducates" (brainwashes) those convicted of repeated criminal acts? And a CG society that gives citizens every opportunity to gainfully employ themselves, but won't help you one cent if you don't take those opportunities? Those societies would be...

I'll take you at your word here - but have you never met someone who passive-aggressively says "no, really, I'm fine, play without me" as a way of getting the group to do what they want instead? I think that's what other people are questioning.

I always felt that ones belief in Good is the ideal, that you wish the best for all people, and that your Lawful/Chaoticness is in how you evaluate the methods used to attain that end. A lawful person feels that order is more important than personal liberty, and although both are nice to have...

Our group settled on a Tempest Cleric, an Evoker Wizard, a Path of Shadows Monk, and an Oath of the Ancients Paladin.

I liked the idea of applying a condition rider to the spell, but that seems a little powerful so I'm dubious. What if you stole the bit from Shocking Grasp about targets of the spell losing their reaction? It would make it extremely useful in certain niche situations.

My first glance at low-level undead suggests that a lot of creatures will be missing immunities they should logically have. Probably an "err on the side of shorter text blocks" mistake.

How would you build a "generic" planar resource, I wonder? You can publish guidelines for, say, mountain terrain or city size guidelines. But short of using "here's an example you can put in your campaign", how would you describe a generic "this is where demons come from" terrain type?

I'm interested. It may come up in my campaign.

But can he track a falcon on a cloudy day?

Could be worse - there's a canonical character in Ravenloft (2e) that, as a fledgling vampire, tricked her boyfriend's ghost into attacking her and aging her a few centuries so she could have elder vampire powers. *cough* *cough* bull**** *cough*

Not in any D&D game I've ever been in. Wolves always attacked humans fearlessly, just like everything else on the random encounter table. This is why, in my current game, I've mentioned that these wolves are the descendants of those that figured out early that fire = humans = easy prey...

I thought of it this way. Surf's analysis of the creatures seems to imply that a monster of CR=level can kill a fighter in three hits. (Other characters two.) So regardless of critter, energy damage aside, this is effectively giving the fighter nine more HP per fight. A greater number of...

Anybody else feel like this thread's gotten a little edition-warry? I think it's gotten a little edition-warry.

Well, see, there's your problem.