Search results

nothing in this or any other world can be timeless. dude I could shoot every halfling in Fr or greyhawk and the game bearly changes only two are core demi-humans

how are the lizardmen more useful as a core option they basically are happy with nothing ever happening they do not build anything or pursue ambitions they feel like a facultative sophont in comparison to everything else obligate?

should we make these video/videos?

the hobbits should not be on the trunk as they are just too limited for most stories by design and the dwarves should grow a second distinct option. the new guys need an example of setting integration.

elaborate as I want to know how they work or are. it is not about denting a monolith more growing new branches on a great tree

how do we make them less lizardy and more dragony? because no one seems to seek to make something new more explore every damn variation of tolkians options beyond adding animal people for some reason. secondly you did not tell me what I asked which was what where these options?

then please give the definitions as all words where once meaningless

to assume the Tolkien options are perfect seems off, regardless you describe a rule for objects defined only as products eg films, books, tv not a game line or broad ideas for some topics of fiction. stone melts and erodes because it does not grow they could be more ideally in the hands of...

TikTok is too short form, but youtube has sufficient video size to do it properly.

we need a video explaining this to the modern reader I know who moorcock is as the chaos guy and where Warhammer stole from but nothing else. a grand explanation of fantasy cannon would be useful devided in eras

not much they are supposed to be from the same area of the Tree of Life one just stole the snake's legs. humanoid is a shape, not a lineage.

I dislike that he is a great sky-dominating lone mountain in fantasy I would prefer chains myself

and in all that time how much have we built onwards from it? dwarves seem to have contacted as an idea for decades, halflings are both used wrong and have few interesting interpretations.(they were designed as a low-importance background option so that the plot could make sense) go on describe...

a second set of arms could work? lung seems to be rather different in base conceptual origin than the western dragon who shares more blood with king ghidorah that the water beasts of the heavens

only in lunar gravity would it work both can be true they create differently. I respect him as a founder but do not see what he made as any more sacred, useful as a starting line but not much past it any more, beyond some back-to-basic revamps for some things.

their wings seem almost vestigial and for cooling off rather than flying. I still do not get the sacredness of the old demihumans why mush they be every where?

vomiting fire is a rather impressive feat in most realities. how are dragons not just dinosaurs with wings to follow on your point? draconians suck as they exist as trick monster orcs not player characters. my point was supposed to be a more joking point of if a half-orc is in as a player...

why, hell why not allow full orcs to let the parent bond with the child? why no gnomes? why stay with the smallest possible options?

look olms have been called baby dragons but I doubt they are that influential.

what dragonborn has no scales?