Search results

Cook 1 player with entry.

Villain as in only evil allowed. Or villain as in just villain. Any alignment.

And you need broad exposure. To other cultures. To other people. Actual understanding. And not baseless disagreements. Detriments are closed groups. But that sometimes cannot be helped.

Color maps. Goddamn. Forgot they even existed. Now rerelease other books with color maps.

Also because they are known monsters? From Nordic myth.

Point is it will mean trying understand different viewpoints. We can all do it. I need to do more of it.

Making friends from other cultures. Would be good.

Then depict both sides. Why must continue to have one dimensional depictions. Why only have cariactures. Get with the times. But we still need to kill enemies. And take their stuff. That is only how we get xp. Okay. Great.

So. Work with consultants. From respective groups. Work from the concerns. Work with the concerns. Making balanced versions does not mean cultural sameness. Such a simplistic view. And not at all what even real life is like. Creating fantastical versions is the goal. Draw from inspiration. Do...

"Want to build a snowman?"

Stop making blanket statements that dismiss the points of others. Or concerns of others. That is not disagreement. That is simple dismissal. Stop doing that. Agree to disagree.

Me and others have asked for balanced versions of fantasy races. You keep saying all we want are monolithic solutions. And automatic agreeance. We have been asking for nuance. And we have been asking for perspective. But you keep insisting that l have not. Or that we have not. What you are...

Increasingly some people are saying because they are not bothered by it it is not a problem. Fundamentally that is a broken worldview. People are not wanting automatic agreeance. They have given viewpoints with points of concern. And reasons for that concern. Incredibly dismissive is saying...

People have given actual concerns. Yet you insist this is just degrees and not actually that negative. Really curious. Quite troubling. Better to emphasize with genuine concerns. Actually understand them. Than keeping on insisting that no harm is meant. Blithely handwaving them away is insane...

Insisting those connotations are not as bad. Or downplaying the negative connotations. Or keeping to perpetuate those negative connotations. Is harmful.

Goddamn problem if the only association with Roman armies are evil, militaristic, warmongering hobgoblins.

Who said anything about simulating history or reality. People are saying deal with inspiration in a respectful manner. You can borrow cool stuff respectfully. Instead of pushing caricatures. Research that serves as inspiration. Portrayals that are not cariactures. But continue to draw...

Also does this mean defeating monsters and eating them. Officially.

That is only said because they want to push a narrative. While downplaying pejorative connotations where people have raised actual concerns.

So. Do better research. And better portrayals. Saying "stop getting offended" is insane.