Search results

I would appreciate an apology. My contribution is that obviously evil monsters do not need as changing. Or much changing. These can be obvious villains to engage with.

Appreciate I would if people would not misconstrue my points. That is not productive. Stop accusing me of trolling I would appreciate it.

That was an honest answer. I gave. Please do not tell me how to post. Do not tell me that I am contributing conflict when I am not. Stop that.

These are obviously monsters. Importantly there is really no racist tones in their depiction. Your question is a red herring.

Yep. Why Dragonlance is so bad with this. Good commits heinous acts. But because good they are good and fine. That does not fly. Nuance is good for a lot more.

Can we damn not. Not something to joke about.

Only reap.

Personally I do not like ability penalties. Much prefer flaws to take their place. Can have same roleplaying prompts. And crafting of stories. Without the hindrances.

So. You agree there should be more nuance to orcs. Good work.

Can we stop with this wording. Please.

Fine line between satire and offense. Easy to cross. Can be fine to satirize Romani as lovable rogues. But taken to dark humor. Offense is simply using only negative stereotypes of them

Lot of posters have answered. In their posts. Problem is will others see a problem getting rid of problem words. And want to keep them in. Because of heritage. Because of fear of change. And push back against this strongly.

Only comes from ignorance. Only comes from misunderstanding. People need points like that to push certain narratives.

Dragon of Ice Spire Peak how about that.

Presented as plot hooks. As encounters. As lore. Matter of factly. How that is problem I do not need tell you. Let alone why.

Problem is. Orcs take from separate groups. But we can work on this. If people are willing.

Some DMs just want control. Unfortunate.

Are you serious. With everything that I have posted. Repeatedly have l called for input from groups. Diverse groups. If this direction of "argument" is put forward no point in further discussion I do see.

We have been asking people to do this. Yes.

^Why maturity needs to be brought to the table by all.