Search results

I've run two 1-20 campaigns over the past seven-ish years. Those levels--and play in them--haven't really been all that well-supported, but we've muddled through. My own thinking is that so few campaigns get there because there's so little support, and I think writing more support for high-level...

Even things like 1% chance: So ... that means like seven people in my high school graduating class?

I think it probably predates fandoms, too. Seems an awful lot like the standard approach to heresy, once the orthodoxy has been established.

I'd probably broaden "get into the woods" some, but I like me some stark landscapes. That's not really an argument, of course.

I'm seeing people elsewhere in my Internet Experience refer to those things as "wanktanks" without the treads ... :LOL:

I haven't done the research to answer "typically," but these didn't last 38,000 miles.

The weight's the big factor, as I understand it, but the way they accelerate--all the torque they put down--makes a difference, too. I think.

So, this past weekend was deeply unpleasant and wildly expensive, and I'm going to rant a little. Feel free to skip. A windstorm blew through here Sunday afternoon about four, and apparently it knocked a tree or a large branch into something really important, because it took like twenty hours...

Unrelated to the above (I think): That looks like a serious category error, I think I'll pass, thanks.

I run entirely homebrew, and I'll absolutely write the narrative situations so they're relevant and interesting to the PCs. I don't specifically aim mechanical things at either the PCs' strengths or their weaknesses, it's up to the players to figure out how to accomplish things. (I will warn the...

Good luck!

It's perpetually surprising how many people are stubbornly wrong.

Unrelated to the above: Well, that didn't take long.

Oh, I know they're real. Not my thing, but real. I was commenting on the grammatical error in the headline. :LOL:

I am not seeing a line through Snarf's name as I write this post. I'm on Firefox, in case it turns out to be about what browser.

There are definitely times it seems like an extensive troll job.

What am I supposed to put inside it, isn't the recipe already set? Oh, did the headline writer want me to give in to the sandwich? They should have said so.

I'm really not arguing, here, but I kinda gotta wonder which would be "aging worse," for (post-)apocalyptic or dystopian fiction: society starts to look like the fiction, or society looks as though the fiction is impossible (or at least implausible)? I can see either answer, honestly.

I'd eat that, but the mushrooms are entirely surplus to my own needs, there.

I'd expect the prosecutors to be talking about defendants flouting the conditions of their bail, not the defense attorneys. Though I might be failing to grok some context, here.