Search results

So with 4e it was also a 3d tabletop (without as high a resolution as Sigil). They also planned something for 3e, which ended up as e-tools?

It tells us that companies make mistakes? The makers of D&D have made many.

That’s excellent. As for scrapping ENWorld, I think that would have added a lot more references to WoW, the warlord, and an overall sense of vitriol.

And speaking of 4e, this would be a minion.

Is clicking on a thread like the one in OP and getting (anything focused on) the Purple Dragon Knight the new rickrolling? It sure feels like it.

That's probably right. I remember issue 100 as a turning point, but we might already be gently stepping down.

Are we past the peak? There will be many more highlights, but we might be coming down from the summit.

If you exclude recycled content…and I have done a lot of that in 5e…then it might just be Lost Mines.

Thunderball a 001, jumping to a 006 for You only live twice? You will have to have negative 00s with this kind of scaling. Spy Who Loved Me might still get to 007. So very very Bond. Edit and ninjaed…but now I know why you liked you only twice so much.

If it’s 5e and your using 2024 characters, 3rd level… …seriously.

2024 D&D could be better in a few ways, and worse in sooo many more. So many bad ideas out there. Plus it is easier to find players for.

Your right. But as I know all too well there will be many, many posts here saying you are wrong.

Of course the OP is right. Do what you like. But I don’t think this site, and certainly not these boards, would exist if they did give not us fans a place to complain. We would do that even if the RPG business was well run, and frequently it is not.

This has come up in play. First question, can it be moved?

5.0 monster stats, especially from the MM, tended to be low (and their special properties usually did not fully compensate). HP are still low, though they are higher at high levels than in 2014. AC is same or 1 higher than 2014 guidance and practice.Attack is 1, 2, then 3 higher then guidance...

Having just posted that, it may also reflect the size of the market. That strategy of supporting multiple not really compatible with each other settings may now make sense with a much larger player base.

And Greyhawk in the DMG. It’s probably just the desire to keep content evergreen, Having released so many adventure books and already dumping a bunch of rules material through the revised core books, they needed to come up with something else that they hadn’t overdone.

I think at some point they hint at that…but time dilation only explains so much.

So 2024 is more like 4e. Now let the denials begin continue. Also, our columnist really buried the question on the humanoids. He kind of but did not really ask it.

5e does not play like 3e. Except to the extent that it plays like any other version of D&D. Skills, spell casting, combat, modifiers and (all those) subsystems, npcs, assumptions about magic items and treasure, all very different. And you’re certainly wrong on “your someone”. I’m not.