Search results

Umm, have you been to a D&D game? That's literally almost always how any game I have been in usually turns out. :D

Dear god, please let us NOT rehash what an open license is again...

Note: It does have the clause that you can KEEP selling your product that was licensed before they amended it, but once you released a new version or new source you were agreeing to use the updated license.

This, the CC, while excellent for a LOT of things, is the wrong license for TTRPG books.

Did you see that Mel made an official release announcement? :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/films/news/mel-brooks-spaceballs-2-sequel-rick-moranis-b2769317.html

I'm not sure why they felt the need to produce another license, when the they could have simply used the ORC?

Around here (norther IN) an acre of non-farming land (which is what it looks like from the pictures they posted) runs about 100k-250k.

Well Troll Lord Games are making big plans. 5 acres, for a factory is a huge amount of space if ONLY doing books, so I'm betting they are planning on printing other companies works as well. And maybe board game pieces? https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1MRDTGkX49/

Do you have "enhanced tracking protection" on, or use an ad blocker or Privacy Badger. Those can mess with the transfer of info from one page to another.

I really feel that every company making a press release about the tariffs needs to start this way.

Yes, it isn't strictly true, that's why I had essentially. But for the VAST majority of publishers trying to figure out HOW to differentiate it in a published work (pdf, book, etc.) is going to take more time than they want, especially if they are a first time publisher.

The problem with CC-BY is that it is essentially all or nothing for a specific document. Each publisher would essentially have to make two documents (if they had IP they wanted to protect, like a setting, town, characters, etc). It's not really a good fit for the TTRPG industry. The difference...

By definition, the ORC makes EVERYTHING that isn't specific IP or lore info open. so I wouldn't use the word "locked" other than that anything that uses BF inherently requires you make yours open also.

I don't "think" any of MCDM's 5e releases that have used the CC-BY have released anything new into the open, but I don't have access to my PDF's at the moment.

I added a bit to my post as you were replying to it, I was just going off your original thoughts post. Once I purchased it and re-read the source, then the AON entry, and then the OGL, & ORC a couple of times. To combine both OGC and ORC is pretty tricky to my understanding of both licenses. You...

The description in your post on that source is... wow they do NOT understand how the licenses work. Edit: I wanted to see the source itself so purchased it. And looking through it I came to the same conclusion you did from your post, the sticking point may be just the name. It looks like they...

Note: I am not a lawyer, more importantly I am not YOUR lawyer (the your in this case is the general reference of anyone that is reading my post) OGC material that is licensed under the OGL, can NOT be used in the ORC, under any circumstances. The licenses are completely incompatible. If you...

And they didn't forget about Eldritch Blast like they did the first 5e SRD. :D

At least it wasn't a TV Tropes link. :)

Use the CC'd SRD and the ORC. :)