Search results

  1. Bagpuss

    D&D General Which Enworlders do you want to game with?

    Any UK members want to meet up at a convention?
  2. Bagpuss

    Give me a prompt and i'll make an image

    How does it do with scenery. Landscape image, highly detailed, an ancient stone circle, clearing in a woodland area, dreamy magical atmosphere, 4k
  3. Bagpuss

    Give me a prompt and i'll make an image

    First image still suffers from the too many fingers problem. I wonder why AI has such a problem with hands.
  4. aleandwhores.png

    aleandwhores.png

  5. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    Sorry going on a bit of a tangent, semi-related to art, but more about the sort of reactions you often get when mentioning romance, sexuality, etc. in RPGs, but particularly D&D. I heard about that but didn't actually see it.
  6. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    Okay then perhaps my question should be why does it seem more of a problem when it is heterosexual relationships expressed in RPGs?
  7. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    Or even two guys sharing a bedroom or even a bed, assumed straight, Laurel and Hardy, Bert and Ernie, Morecambe and Wise.
  8. morecambe_wise_bed.jpg

    morecambe_wise_bed.jpg

  9. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    Oddly perhaps, queer RPGs are one of the places people seem fine with sexual content in an RPG. Thirsty Sword Lesbians fine, Horny Bards bad. Monsterhearts, good; straight fighter hooking up with the barmaid, bad. Perhaps because in order to be queer content, it has to allow for expressing...
  10. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    Exactly no sex, but lots of hints and innuendo about it.
  11. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    True but I can't recall any* many RPGs that reduce women to that roll... and certainly not your average D&D module. *Tell a lie, I can think of three all of which are historical based on periods and genres where women had very restricted rolls, and all the PCs are male characters. En Garde...
  12. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    Well I'm happy for you but I'm British so use to titillation in virtually all my media even stuff aimed at kids. I guess you need to grow up with Pantomime and Carry on Movies.
  13. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    No, not usually. Just people flirting in character.
  14. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    Wow, 7th level spell Finger of Death will kill most people, a few Magic Missiles will kill most people. Killing people is simple.
  15. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    Nothing wrong with that, but generally it's been between players from my experience rather than with NPCs.
  16. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    There is "overrepresentation of stereotypically" fit and attractive male characters as well. It's fantasy art, not Walmart. Well that goes without saying.
  17. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    Right so, by that reckoning (first part in bold) all of the art in Reasonably costumed women in fantasy art • r/ReasonableFantasy is still a serious problem, (please have a look though a couple of pages and see if anyone isn't young, slim and beautiful). The second part in bold we've shown that...
  18. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    I'll have to check it out, but I imagine they were trying to invoke the feel of the classic Morgan Ironwolf illustration by Jeff Dee in 80's red box D&D.
  19. Bagpuss

    What We Lose When We Eliminate Controversial Content

    They quality of the art improved a lot as well, and perhaps most importantly the binding. There were certainly more complaints about 1st edition falling apart than there were about the art it contained.
Top