Search results

Well I tend to look at the Fermi Paradox from the angle of Great Filters that might be ahead of us. If intelligence is just really freaking rare that's good. If every intelligence lifeform tends to blow up their planet the first time they try to crack FTL, well, that's bad for us.

I'm conflicted about if I want for it to happen this way or not. Like if abiogenesis happened on Venus independent of Earth, that's amazing, it means it's easy, the universe will be just flooded with at least single cellular life everywhere, And depressing, that all that life and we see...

Well there are places in the upper atmosphere of Venus that are rather earth like in temperature and pressure, I could see microbes floating in clouds, I'm just not sure how live like that could begin. (then again no one knows how live began so shrug)

Yes I'm very new to CK... however I play a ton of Rimworld, so I guess my quest will be to turn the pope into a hat.

That's a good one, I'd eat the pope but I don't wanna go full cannibal. My game I'm enjoying that everyone seems to hate the pope (who was already pop when the game started) and the reason is "Catholicism prefers a female head of faith" It was kinda curious to me that setting same sex...

Well, picked this up, I've already poor tons of money into Cities:Skylines and Stellaris DLC might as well add this. The game won me over when I found out there's a game rule setting for inverted gender equality, and a setting to force all religions to accept same sex relationships.

VERY much in favor of this!

I'm think you misunderstood me, I was saying it worried me, in that it's making me think sticking to backwards compatibility is a bad idea, not that I'm worried we'll won't stick to it. I'm saying that if we hold tight to exactly how things are done in WOTC's books what's the point of even...

The fact that we can't even change small things is why I'm really worried about the "Backward compatible"

I did not even know about this word before you post and now I'm soo happy you used it!

Well I'd already had 3 character ideas before I got to the general culturals so yeah

interesting, to me Angel means Servant of god more than it means servant of good. and I'm wondering if the reasons for that get into to things we're not allowed to talk about here.

1. Keaton 2. Bale 3. West 4. Kilmer 5. Clooney. 6. (temp ranking till seen) Pattinson 7. Affleck

Can I ask why this is so important to most of the people making warlords? It kills the appeal of the class for me. For me the biggest draw of the Warlord is so I can do things like "Ok for this campaign there are no gods, so no divine classes allowed" and have the math still work.

I appreciated this one, especially in future settings I'm often looking for the cool gear that non-adventurers use. however I did find that several of these items came across with a more "magic" feel than a hi-tech. Sufficiently advanced and all, I know but it's about feel. and...

I personally have never been a fan of having class and level in the spell descriptions, I'm a big fan of tags. But that's largely cuz I like the idea of adding more classes and then it's always just awkward, tags work great cuz you can just say this class has access to these tags.

Just cuz I myself often make that mistake of hope long ago things were, I thought I'd mention that 3.0 came out in 2000 and 3.5 in 2003

I guess the initial answer of what I left D&D for was d20 Modern, we found we liked modern setting so much more than fantasy that we just dropped D&D for years! completely skipped the 3.5 era. No other time could I say I left D&D, I loved 4e, my friends didn't so we played a lot of different...

This, everything about this!!!!

Except for things like Steel Dragons, and Iron Dragons already existed long long before 4e and have nothing to do with gem dragons. I can't remember the details of the iron dragon, but the 4e Steel Dragon matches up very well to the 2e steel dragon, so it's not a gem dragon rip off. And I...