Search results

why, hell why not allow full orcs to let the parent bond with the child? why no gnomes? why stay with the smallest possible options?

look olms have been called baby dragons but I doubt they are that influential.

what dragonborn has no scales?

less love as hating it is a nation sport, more a needed difference so you know what you are dealing with. I assume sarcasm.

air and water is blood being both needed for life

it is more the crop of dms as if those are slashed or leave sales will go down as you will have less people staying and a ai dm is still a while away from anything past the most basic stuff

I saw the news for dnd beyond which is as likely to keep customers away as it is to get money from them. which is worthless if no new stuff happens and we are not getting a bg4 from the same studio any time soon

the shareholders would eat them, nothing but adventures and at best a slight update to some sub-classes is business suicide. people want the promise of something interesting they just need to get better at that. some new content in different areas but packed in a reliably sellable way they...

blight is still an option

5e adventures seem to be very hit or miss not a sustainable business plan as 5.5 seems not likely to shoot up in quality

why what do the plan to sell, people already complain about sub class bloat?

dude stop worrying they will just re-fluff it. the point of unique mechanics it to make it separate from the multi-class in much the same way paladin is not a cleric fighter multiclass

paladins do make more sense as high conviction divinely sanctioned beat sticks the oaths are better than an alignment even if only as it sorts out what the hell anything means by say LG

my suggestion is that there is nothing about myth and science that can't be blended in dnd, we have ray guns in the dmg. it is more tha the para elementals are mostly just physical combinations, you complain about science yet do the same there is no myth to salt or dust you need something with...

I thought it was more everyone arguing over mechanics which is always hard or people saying it is a bad idea.

there is a medium between hyper-specific and so broad as to nearly be anything. it should be no more specific than paladin and ranger and should be a able to have other small concepts contained in it.

gith gishs are arcane the psionic gish is even less represented. sub classes seems viable as how you build them could be interesting. 4es was mobility and damage types could be used with a gith gish fairly easily a death knight embodies the words unwilling to die and would be a decent tank...

damn radioactive wild fire now there is a evil wizard option. sulfur is brimstone as is to hell adjacent for marketing.

but earth is rock, soil and sand it does not feel acid which is the grinding down of solid by liquid/ water is cold but so is the wind, cold is this deep absence to the world not a thing you touch, water Being acid goes well with its mutability and it grinds down the world, like all chaos does...

wait so what do you think they should make then as apart from rereleasing all of 5e for 5.5e I do not see much they can do that will get people excited. I do find that it is more not designed to support what people who want coop storytelling, would need a far less punishing stat system, more...