Search results

Who said anything about former use? That dungeon was using a literal real world castle map as a castle and outpost connected to the BBEG.

Ratio in terms of what? If I'm building a dungeon based on a castle I might have four servant's quarters or privies for every duke's bedroom or ballroom. And there won't be much loot in the former two categories. In terms of volume of floorspace I therefore have no problem with the idea that...

Yes it does. If a dungeon only has five interesting locations and twenty tedious ones then it's a better adventure if you get to the interesting ones in two sessions than if you do in ten.

Good. They had cripplingly few of them from 2014-2019. And I do mean cripplingly few to the point they were easily the weakest full caster. Seriously someone has to be the best - and I consider it a good thing that after ten years of being right at the bottom of their categories people can now...

This is the sort of arc I'd expect to see out of Oath of the Crown. (I'm very much a proponent of Paladins changing subclasses as a result of character development)

Within a rounding error everyone who posts on ENWorld who plays at all is a DM (I seem to recall 95% of EnWorld posters are sometimes DMs and 75%+ normally DM). Indeed the majority of people who care enough to post about it online in just about any non-newbie forum (rather than just show up to...

I'm surprised by your selections. The Horizon Walker Ranger is the non-PHB ranger I think I have seen discussed the most online. The Oath of the Crown is the "warlock paladin"; a paladin whose oath was to a shady employer. In terms of inherent plot and roleplaying I think its the best of the...

I didn't purchase the 2014 PHB until I could get an edition not thanking the RPG Pundit. So I only bought the core books years after I'd started running a campaign. This one? I was expecting to get given they had an ongoing campaign. The playtest at a couple of points (mostly round half-casting...

I'm expecting it to be slightly more successful than the attempt to boycott Modern Warfare 2. But that's only because you don't need to buy the books to use the rules.

Mine were GURPS and WFRP. Which has given me a life-long amusement at anyone who claims that any edition of D&D has ever been remotely gritty.

Yeah, Dungeon World (and PbtA games in general) fit just outside my rules light definitions on just about all counts. But I'm well aware the lines are arbitrary and all the factors I've mentioned have been taken into account by Vincent Baker; he just added a touch more complexity (which isn't...

I do allow rules handouts - and character sheets. What I'm saying here is that the time spent physically finding the rules in the book weighs the game down in ways that don't apply if you can look at your character sheet or the common rules to find them in a second or two. Presentation matters.

They absolutely do. They bring the game to a screeching halt as you need to first find the relevant table and then find the place in the table. Tables are IMO the heaviest common mechanic out there; modifiers are just mental arithmetic. (Basically the only game grouping I'm aware of to use...

I tend to have the following rules of thumb for rules light: Never need to crack open the books during play even in the first sesion A full character can either be scrawled by a player with poor handwriting as on one side of an an index card or printed with all practical options available at...

AD&D 1e has literally 60 pages of spells. And spells are character options. By contrast a PbTA character sheet is two sides and contains all options for that class on every level up other than "pick an option from another class". Even by your own standards AD&D is not in the same room as rules...

See, this makes me sigh. Last night I was playing the actually rules light game Lasers and Feelings where the entire game's rules fit onto a single side of A4. Tomorrow night I will be running a game of Dread where the resolution mechanic is a Jenga tower. Those are rules light games. Tonight...

Whoever said that dungeon exploration needs to be rules light. AD&D 1e wasn't

This is the first time I've heard anyone say dungeon exploration in 1e can't be fun.

What does the cleric have? It's defined by Full casting off a custom list Turning undead And the latter isn't much more than a ribbon. The wizard is defined by A spellbook Breadth of arcane spells Ritual mastery And it's subclasses work against its breadth. It would be better as a sorcerer...

Nah. The wizard should become the bookish sorcerer subclass.