Search results

No, I mean it seems that WoTC will now only cater to the majority, and dang with the minority. And the majority seem to be fine with this and/or not care, as long as they’re getting what they want. Share the love people:)

I feel you man, I had the same guys now for a long time too, and I've allways been the one lumbered with the DM job (not that I don't love it). The only game of 4th Ed that I played as a player is the RPGA game at GENCON OZ I mention in an erlier post. Loved every minute of it and wished to do...

I am aware of what I currently get out of my subscription; my point is that what so good of having all that martial for a game that I have difficulty even getting to play. Please do not take my remarks as a rant on "am I getting my moneys worth from WOTC", I'm sure that's been done to death...

Oops double post.....

Survey results are only as good as the people that you ask. I do believe that the majority of the people that were asked mayhap live in areas that have decent player pools to draw on for face to face play. I myself would love to have that, and I too prefer face to face play, if I can get it...

Thanks for the info Shemeska The other element that I'm concernd to the VTT is RPGA. I’m a registered RPGA Game Master, and have been a member since the mid 90’s and so far I’ve held the one Living Grayhawk (3.5ed) home game (I’ve had plenty of players but none that can commit to be able to...

Forgive me if this has been answered before, but does anyone know what’s happening with the Virtual Game Table and Character Visualiser as promised by WOTC. It seems that all word has gone dead on this subject (and I'm a subscriber too.) I may be making an assumption but, from what I picked up...

Sorry, but I mean "no tact" as in "no class", or no decorum. Not tact as in tactics. Meaning: good for hitting thing, but not for inviting around for dinner, let alone escorting your daughter to the debutant ball.:eek:

Looking at the play test Barbarian, which to me looks like all damage and no tact. The Bard should be the opposite, little damage and lots of buffs. A Leader with some controller abilities. IMHO.

^^^ What he said. also A parring dagger (Adventures Vault) adds to TWD. It's an unnamed bonus. A parring dagger is like a heavy shield to TWD. But it's a superior weapon, so it costs a feat, but you still get to uses it as an offhand secondary attack if you have the power to do so.

I kinda like the barb (this build anyway) "as is". It fits the idea of a barbarian to me. It's pure smack down and not much good for anything else. The role-playing barbarian: DM: "You walk into a Tavern, what do you do?" Barb: (In the best Arnie voice) "I 'it it wit mi arx" DM: "hmm ok...

Sorry, but thats 3.x simulist thinking. You don't lose you Shield bonus if you use your shield in an attack that round. Just the same as you still get the shield bonus for a shield of bashing whenever you use it's magical bonus with an attack. Or if you are a ranger and use Twin Strike when you...

Seems that this barbarian feels a lot like Slaine (Sláine (comics) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) than Conan. "It's time for a Warp SPASM....ARRRGGGHHHHHH!"

Official word from Wizards customer support. So in my game I'll allow it on a case by case bases, but as a general ruling:- only effects that don't require "Hit" effects, (or "Miss" for that matter) unless targeted at an actual object (if not a creature) provided object is susceptible, (or...

Taking into account the update from Wizards, for the players handbook to page 57 reguarding targets. Would it then be feasible (DM’s discretion provided) to use a power targeted to a space/ground (or passing fly for that matter) that is within reach? Or would this cause to much abuse to the...