Search results

▯

▯

▯

▯

▯

▯

▯

▯

▯

▯

▯

▯

▯

Yes, that's the nature of hasty generalizations. A single counterexample is enough to explode them. That was sort of my point.

It seems to me that there's a lot of unjustified universalizing going on here. Not everybody creates new settings for the sake of new campaigns. Not everybody creates settings or campaigns for the sake of players realizing character concepts. Not everybody runs or plays RPGs for the sake of...

Yeah. What of it? While I'm open-ish about races, there are six — count 'em, six and only six, never a single one more than that — core character classes that exist in my D&D campaign. There is no discussion about this; players don't get a say in it. Strangers, acquaintances, longtime friends...

I have too. And it's usually vague to the point of meaninglessness. Players are entitled . . . to whatever the group playing the game decides they're entitled to. It's up to the group, not to WotC or a population of forum-goers or the hobby as a whole. Y'all don't get a vote on what the players...

For a time, I ran BECMI campaigns using an alternative advancement mechanic that I called "Achievement Points." It was simple enough: human characters needed 8 AP to gain a level, and demihumans needed 10 AP. Every session was worth 1–3 AP to each character, with the award based on the DM's...