Search results

I just wanted to give props for that 2E joke you worked in there. Nice work.

I also have a black cat named Gary! Though, I spell it Gari. But still, close enough to be in the club!

Not really related to anything going on here, but the thumbnail made me think of it. A few years ago at Gameholecon I found myself outside of the Clarion hotel, absolutely destroyed off of like a case of Spotted Cow having a cigarette with the boys. Some time passes and it's just me and Peter...

Love this thread. I don't really care for the Peter Jackson movie aesthetic, which post-movie kind of took over everything. Same as others love all the classic MERP art. Though I do love this art for the German collection published back in like the 70s or 80s. Gives real hospital waiting...

100% If D&D went under right now (and even assuming you only ever play "official D&D" and nothing else) there's still more content out than you'd ever use. Plus, you know, you could make stuff up.

Yeah, agreed. I don't like 13th Age for different reasons, but I do like their abstract engagement ranges. I think the old Middle Earth RPG (the non-5E one) had a similar thing too. Now, I've invested those flat Pathfinder standees with bases for enemies. It's cheap and I can store thousands...

In wrestling parlance, Venger has been booked badly. How are we supposed to buy him as a big bad when he couldn't win against literal children even once out of dozens of tries.

We played this way for a few sessions, since a square is a set measurement (forget what exactly it is off the top of my head) but yes, a powers area of effect can be easily converted on the fly. That worked fine, but yeah the issue became that even if we did that the positioning was still too...

You like Kobolds do you? Sit here and smoke a whole pack of 'em! See what you say then.

I did enjoy this set alot. Though I like the AD&D 2E starter box First Quest more because it came with plastic minis and a very cheesy audio cd.

If you had asked me in 1998 who would be the bigger detriment to D&D between Lorraine Williams and the concept of shareholders. I, uhm, would not have picked the concept of shareholders.

If WotC does change the name somebody should put up a new version of Purple Dragon Knight based entirely around Prince. Like, your level 3 ability is to ride a motorcyle in the rain with a ruffled blouse.

But daaaaddddd I want my level 1 Half Tabaxi/Tortle/Aasimar/Gith Warlock/Fighter Hexblade Assasin to be able to use his level 3 ability of Raining Blood Everlasting noooooowwww

Considering Hasbro is decreasing their toy production (outsourcing a fair amount of what they used to make themselves to others) and wanting to transition to being an "IP company" you kind of have to make more D&D shows and movies. So not really surprising. When these also inevitably fail, it...

Well, that didn't end up so well for me right after leaving the vault in Fallout 1, but I get your meaning. I'm also an exceptionally unskilled individual.

Both are really good for classic sword and sorcery they do a good job of replicating Vance and Leiber respectively. If you like DCC and like either of those authors it's pretty much a no brainer purchase.

I see we're in the Book of Erotic Fantasy portion of the 5E lifecycle.

I've fully embraced Nihilism so I prefer the doom that takes the most oligarchs with me.