Search results

The Immortal's Handbook Bestiary has what you need. Dire/Behemoth/Teratoid/Macrobe templates to increase an existing construct's size, a number of new constructs with stats already up to that size, and even pretty precise rules for making new constructs out of whichever material you'd like...

I'm pretty sure that when it comes to v5, every time it says "CR" it really means "ECL" instead. I've taken to calling it the "ECL document" instead of the "CR document".

I case you're really asking, not quoting, it's the rejected or waste parts of a butchered animal. Unpleasant stuff, as a general rule.

PCGen is quite a bit faster than E-Tools (although, given that it's written in Java, still slower than I might wish) It also has more options, and an easier to use interface (IMHO). Not to mention it's far more customizable and adaptable. You still buy the datasets from the Code Monkeys (SRD...

Divine Abilities: Achilles Heel (#2): Too much dice rolling slows down combat, and if everytime someone attacks they have to roll a d20 again for that weak spot, it'll be too slow. Instead, say that anyone rolling a natural 20 attacking you automatically confirms the critical and deals maximum...

I love aboleths, and use them all the freaking time. Whether it be the insideous force behind the strange change of personality of the king (or duke or baron or whatever), or if it's the monster in the cellar, or the watery guardian to an ancient tomb, I always find room for the aboleth...

I think this is exactly why U_K replaced wealth with the 4 artifact rule in Ascention.

Okay, time to get picky! Note that as is, the entire feat list is readable and usable. These are just little tiny editor-type issues I have. Epic Feats only: Blood Rage (#6): "Your when reduced" is grammatically nonsensical. I can get what you're trying to say, but fix this anyway please...

Okay, house rule that you can take "gestalt-style" PrCs while gestalting. For fun, lets even house rule that you can take two PrCs simultaneously. This still doesn't work.

Honestly, I'd easily pay as much as four bucks for version 6, maybe even five, which aint bad considering the small page count. But really, I've gotten so much mileage out of v5, it's silly.

That's a pretty standard variant. On the other hand, opposed rolls can bog down combat by having too many dice rolls in a row with not enough "bang for the buck" (repeated rolls without a final result can get boring fast). You may find it simpler to assume that the attacker is "Taking 10" on...

You might want to consider allowing the three different types of quintessence to stack instead of overlap, and then make the event grant multiple types of quintessence. I'd imagine that there'd be a SIGNIFICANT portion of that from draining quintessence from nodes or powerful artifacts...

Oops, yep. It would. d100s and double max on the roll too to boot. Fixed now.

Yggdrasil is done: here Even comes with runes of knowledge for Odin to gain power from!

Statting up some more dragon gods for fun. I assume Typhon (mentioned in the epic dragon intro) is the Great, Great, Great Wyrm Timber Dragon that you had planned? However, I found an interesting little thing. I would presuppose that Yggdrasil, if not merely an artifact, would be an Elder God...

Copied the most recent list into the NPC Wiki: Here. Non-supporters can't search the ENWorld forums, but anyone can search the wiki.

Why not just use negative scores? The math works out... Alternatively, you could use negative exponents. 1 = -5 0 = Can't Act = N/A (There are already rules for things that happen at 0) -1 = -6 = 2^-1 = 1/2 -2 = -6 = 2^-2 = 1/4 -3 = -7 = 2^-3 = 1/8 -4 = -7 = 2^-4 = 1/16 etc.

The RAW also pretty much says you can too. The argument you'll get is that this is either unrealistic or unfair, and if you feel this way and are the DM, go ahead and houserule. But by RAW, yes. You can. If you'd like to play by RAW and are bothered by the "realism" factor, there are all...

Not having complete mage and seeing the title, I was hoping these would be feats that would make a fae (say, a nymph or pixie) more powerful, but alas, they lack significant utility for actual fae, as they do for anyone. They just aren't overpowered, and I can think of better feats to be taken...

For low-epic play, I think those feats may still be overpowered. The concept of the warlock is a magic user that uses magic weaker than a wizard or sorcerer's, but unlimited times per day. As such, giving the warlock an 8th level spell at will as soon as 21st level seems a little overpowered...