Search results

Y'know, now that you mention it, there are no size penalties for staves or rods... if you were really enterprising, you could make yourself a set of Fine staves/rods, hang 'em from an earring, and have 'em all available at any given moment...

As I see it, a god of adventurers doesn't really have much of an advantage over a god of farmers. Think about it. God of adventurers gets a massive sudden influx of quintessence when adventurers save the day, which happens every once and a while, but not exactly every day. I mean, yeah...

I prefer not rolling HP as well. My players, again, who love rolling the dice, have overrulled me, so the way I have them do it is roll the HD type, take half, and add it to the average. That way, they never have below average HP, but there's still some variation outside of con scores. But...

Oh man, that was brilliant! Illegal enchantment didn't interest me, but getting prosecuted for the bucket 'o snails trick? Brilliant!

Oh, I know about bonuses. Carapace, as it stands though, grants a bonus of quadruple your current natural armor, whatever that may currently be. So if your natural armor is currently 23 (and you've only got 20 HD) and you take the ability, you get natural armor 92. Which is silly. Instead of...

Grease is a spell, with a set area that it effects, selected by the caster. It doesn't slide down, it stays where you put it.

I statted up a Bale Fiend. Double-dipping on the divine side of things, but the CR looks right to me on a quick eyeball check...

While mucking about with making some critters, I noticed something that is entirely unfair: the Carapace Divine Ability. If you apply a divine template on top of a creature that already has natural armor, such as a dragon or a demon, this can make a creature that is impossible for fighters to...

I love point buy with a passion. While rolling the dice is fun, I find something appaling about the concept of rolling once and having that effect the game from then on. You don't roll for feats, why roll for stats? On the other hand, my players, as a general rule, disagree with me, and much...

So is the cover painted yet? On a scale of 1 to 10, how awesome is it?

In case you still cared, stats for the Phoenix as a lesser deity according to the Immortal's Handbook: Divine Phoenix.

My Divine Phoenix gets a +51 to Bardic Knowledge checks. Here are the DCs for Bardic Knowledge: 10 - Common, known by at least a substantial minority drinking; common legends of the local population. 20 - Uncommon but available, known by only a few people legends. 25 - Obscure, known by few...

If you want an awesome godlike phoenix, you could check out my Paragon Bardic Phoenix that I statted up a while ago. Hmmm... that reminds me... The Immortal's Handbook just came out, I should give the Phoenix some quintessence and divine ranks...

You have to apply the Demiurge template to this thing at least once, and then replace those bleedin' feats with some SDAs, SCAs, STAs, and of course, eventually, SOAs. That's Salient Divine Abilities, Salient Cosmic Abilities, Salient Transcendental Abilities, and Salient Omnific Abilities for...

That could probably be statted up with existing rules, such that it isn't really a NEW thing... well, unless you MAKE it a new thing, of course. But I'm thinking Gestalt or Tauric the Balor and Pit Fiend together, then advance as you see fit, and apply whatever divine template seems appropriate.

Of those? Demilich, obviously. I would agree with you. The trick is, of course, comming up with the apropriate inspiration... how do you make something so small, so powerful? For the moment, I'd like to consider non-purely magical means... in that if you're just piling on caster levels, you...

I really liked the runic nature of that first set, so it got my vote. What would be really awesome though, would to be to have a deck consisting of more traditional card art, with those rune symbols in the corner of the card.

By a strict reading of the rules, you can also get SA while flanking at range, although you don't get the flanking bonus to attack at range.

I'm assuming then that the Grimorie will include some sort of metamagic feat that will lower a spell's level? Or are you just going to add a new use to AMC?

The "Magic Circle vs Evil" at will alone means it CAN'T be a negative LA. That's just too good, really. I agree with +4 though.