Search results

It's mentioned.

Don't Italian sausages exist? I just figured that's what they were... Re: Celestial--> It's a big deal, for sure...just not sure how it would impact, mechanically, peoples' day-to-day lives so that they would change in a significant way. At some point, most people would just default to...

Is Roll20 the place to look for meaningful data re: PF2e. though? It seems, from what I can tell, most PF2E players use Foundry (which is awesome for the game). Edit: Ninja'd by @payn

Well, sure, if the bar to jump is as low as ONE PERSON then yeah, you are technically right but it's a point without merit. In your original post, however, you said "4e fans." Much higher bar, and it hasn't been cleared.

Nonsense. What are you even basing this on? 4e was my group's fav version of D&D but we enjoyed 13A just fine, PF2E as well...People might prefer 4e, but 'the only one they'll accept?' Yeesh.

I would think that wouldn't require a check, then.

Do those sound like things untrained people should have a believable chance at succeeding at? Tracking? Disarming? I think the "gotta be trained" filter is to stop people from creating weird scenarios by just rolling a 20. I understand that's a subjective preference though. I happen to like...

?? Where does it say this?

Follow treasure map; find ancestor

Really? THAT's what was happening? Come on, man...

100% this.

There's not a single story (movie, book, show) that survives this level of nitpicky questioning. Some are funny (the wall from S1 to S2), and some are just demanding that characters always behave in the most logical "I-know-I'm-in-a-story" way. If everyone everywhere always make the most...

Yeah, between this, Outlander and BSG I have become quite the McCreary fan!

I have him blocked, so I don't know what his points of contention are.

Maybe it just doesn't make sense to you.

Mephisto was in the Ben Affleck Daredevil movie??

Fine. As someone else who read the articles, without any hyperbole, they are an excellent example of being nitpicky, and therefore shouldn't be taken too seriously as a source of valid criticism.

Well look, if the author of the article did indeed do what TheSword points out here, it's the very definition of nitpicky.

Wait, are you saying the author of the article did NOT do this: He states that the old man turning the key couldn’t have produced enough torc to shift the stonework and because he didn’t see the mechanics behind that he won’t consider it 😳 wow. He states that while steam based explosion can...

I dunno...seemed pretty nitpicky.