Search results

...

I don't think you need to feel so bitter about the situation. Like you, I also greatly prefer PF1 to the current iteration. However, I do not feel bitter that Paizo has moved on at all. It's actually liberating. I currently own far more 1e content than I'll ever get to use. Paizo have served us...

That hat... :confused:

I guess you're thinking of the old Pathfinder Module line for First Edition, which did indeed contain a number of gems. Sadly, they tended to be overshadowed by the Adventure Paths. This is the Second Edition iteration, although it lacks the Module branding, as did the previous Fall of...

Okay, I've just backed this on the strength of your post. I was concerned the tone might not be palatable to me, but your post was an excellent reminder that I'll be free to colour my game any way I wish. Thank you.

I find the premise interesting as well. My main concern is not the fact that it is clearly dated, but the fact that playing as forces on the side of either of the superpowers during the cold war seems rather objectionable. When I had this game as a kid, I happily accepted the default assumption...

I'll agree with him on the portrait orientation, but I do tend to stand (and pace,) a lot while GMing, so will accept I may be in the minority here. Don't agree re: art on player's side. It may not be useful as such, but GM screens are an aesthetic choice for me as much as anything else. My...

That seems an odd approach. Personally, as a hardened PF1 fan, PF2's arrival has broadened my gaming palette. As I'm no longer needing to buy any Pathfinder stuff, I have money to invest in other systems or board games. I'd rather play 5e than PF2. I don't love either system, but at least it's...

Physical copies of the first print run are totally sold out due to the recent P2 Humble Bundle. I believe (based on shipping updates,) the second print run is not in the warehouse as of yet, so it makes sense it's pretty hard to find in the wild.

But, how does that feel for the Sorcerer, making such a modest contribution to the "fast and furious" combat. Spellcasting certainly doesn't appear "fast and furious" to me.

Is that an improvement?

People always cite this as some compelling reason to embrace the Second Edition, but it's been available for First Edition Pathfinder since 2015.

Sadly, I don't think we'll ever get an AP like Rise of the Runelords again from the big RPG publishers. I've just reread the first four books prepping to run a group of newbies through it and I just can't see either Paizo or Wizards wanting to go that dark again given the current gaming milieu.

If it were as interesting as the first 5e Monster Manual, no thanks.

Well, it's not standard fantasy really. It's nothing like anything you would generally play using Pathfinder or Dungeons and Dragons. It's futuristic fantasy. Personally, I really like Starfinder. However, I tend to avoid Starship combat like the plague. Our local Pathfinder Society seems to be...

I just saw on the Paizo forums claims that Legendary Games is planning to release a 1.5 style edition of Pathfinder under the working title Corefinder. The following text was apparently taken from Legendary Games' Discord.

I see. Then, if combat is actually more deadly, I wonder why they decided to make spellcasting so much less effective offensively?

Really? I'm quite surprised to hear that given how the new iteration of Pathfinder has effectively removed save or die, and even the more punishing save or suck effects, from the game.

They can do whatever they like. I just said to me it seems lame and I don't blame fans of the game for feeling uncomfortable with it either. Are we not permitted to disapprove of a company's commercial decisions?

Personally, I don't think it is unreasonable for long time fans to be uncomfortable with the current trend of releasing TV show themed product for Dungeons & Dragons. I'm not a D&D player, so I certainly don't claim to be any type of arbiter, but I'd be disappointed if my favourite game was...