Search results

When I first saw that, I didn't immediately associate 4e fanbois with the kobolds.

Sure, if you say so.

I don't think I'd go so far as to call them sycophants.

...there really is no point for this conversation to exist. Nothing against the OP, but a topic like this was doomed from the start to be cast to a fiery death by the 4e zealots.

I'm pretty sure it did.

Aasimar was a neat name, if a little goofy. Deva... I don't know if I like it, but it's workable. Certainly a lot better than some of the other names WotC has thrown around as of late. Though thinking about it, aasimar just sounds like it was made to look and sound "exotic" simply for the sake...

Did you miss the part where the OP asked to not have to suffer such responses?

That sounds like a rather reasonble combination of the two styles.

I'm not speaking for Remathilis, here, but I wanted to throw my two cents in. Because I, the player, am not my character. I can play a character with either a 2 Strength or a 20, and this is accounted for in the game. I personally am not expected to be held to the limits of a 2 Strength, nor...

For those who are interested in having a plot alongside this method, I think that could be done. Say there is a plot - the party is looking for the MacGuffin, say. The DM has an idea of where it is, and several tables for rumors regarding it (a set of minor rumors, a set of medium rumors, a set...

I run a homebrew, and players sure do have an effect; that's part of the appeal of a homebrew, IMO. The entire plot of the next game I'm going to run was set in motion by actions taken by a character from a campaign two years' past. If you don't have an impact on the world, what's the point of...

Sleep in a solo encounter. That is why handing out the ability to throw a -5 onto somebody's saves is a really bad idea.

"Do you know what time it is in Japan? It's 4pm tomorrow. They're in the future!"

How's that myopia working out for you?

So it would seem that 4e is popular amongst insomniacs and Europeans. Wonder if WotC will take that into account for future supplements? ;)

Well, as we all know, kittens are deadly. :p

Okay, let's get this out of the way: One True Way-ism is idiotic. Says you. Others would not say so. The PC paladin is important in the sense that he is whose story is being followed at the moment; that does not, from an in-world perspective, make him more important than the NPC paladin...

I've moved past D&D at this point, but if I'm going to play it, I prefer 3.5. It's the edition I know best and am most comfortable with, on either side of the screen.

Couldn't they have been one thread? I admit that I see where the Professor is going, but I'll try not to ascribe motives here. It does seem a little odd to have two threads, both worded pretty much identically, but with marginally different subjects. But then, that's been going around a lot...

...right, because my post was obviously as nasty as the one I quoted.