Search results

Snipped out because of misunderstanding......

AL DMs are not allowed to change any rules that are explicitly stated. Nothing in the ALPG contradicts that, and nothing in Sage Advice over-rules that. Being the 'final arbiter' covers any rulings and interpretations the DMs make regarding grey areas or areas not covered or areas only implied...

Which would be odd, since I believe it only goes to 10th level....

While the details could change things.... I am excited about it. I like the tighter format, and I think the restrictions let the designers do things they could not otherwise. Have you guys thought about how it will impact replay-ability during future seasons? Next year can we just do 4-5...

Well... that was very fast and informative. :) So lets push my luck... the AMA discussed some LGS only content, separate from 'expeditions' and separate from the hardback. Is that happening for Season 4? (I heard Season 4 was going to use content from the hardback, as in the past seasons.)

Thanks for the update and info... Could you give us an idea regarding how many of the 14 will be 2 hour vs 4 hour adventures?

I disagree. Cutting words subtracts from the attack roll, bardic inspiration adds to the attack roll. I don't see a difference in the verbage to warrant treating them differently. I am not against CW negating crits, but then so should Bane. And BI and Bless should allow for crits.

EE has a number of very cool side quests. The main stuff is just a big dungeon crawl, but the side quests are pretty cool, and would be easy to work into any campaign.

I found it to be very anti-climactic, and a wasted opportunity. There were a lot of good questions that could have cleared up a lot of concerns....but they went unanswered. Then a lot of goofy questions that they spent time on. Seemed like an odd priority for the day after such a major...

The seasons are the same, you could always play any adventure from any season at any time. The only change is now you can play in private.

There is just no comparison. Even with only a single table with 6 players, you are talking about $1 a *month* to get access to every mod. At that rate it would take a few years to equal one box of mini's.

Because it makes a lot more sense to put out the info, give people some time to digest it and think about it, and *then* have a Q&A.

I had a neat chase scene in mind through some of the caverns.....some back and forth, some light hearted fiascos.... just a fun encounter. Then my stupid Vengeance Paladin used his CD to Abjure Enemy and stopped the short speed-demon in his tracks.... very anti-climactic.... but a really good...

Thanks to this thread reminding me about CF, my new cleric now has a bitchin' cool holy *flaming* holy symbol...

Are the Season 3 mods up for sale? I knew about earlier ones.... I must say, I am apprehensive... on one hand, I have liked what the Admins have been doing thus should trust them about this....OTOH I don't have a good feeling about this, and it may not be based on Admin feedback... I think...

eh... still not that significant. Its not completely trivial, but since it only happens 5% of the time, being able to stop it just isnt' that big of an impact. And compare stopping a crit to stopping a hit.... Warding Flare etc can turn a hit into a miss....which not only happens much more...

It is completely DM discretion, but.... I think the spell itself indicates that it is meant to provide a steed, not a combat beast. So while I would agree on the beasts getting more powerful for higher level Paladins, (I believe) they should still be 'just a steed'. One DM uses increased...

I thought you had done something with this concept. Its what made me believe it was feasible. Did you not 'save' it over here? ANy advice?

So.... here is what I would like for an 8th level 1-shot. I need a dex based barbarian... I would *like* him to also be a halfling... (edit: or perhaps a Forest Gnome) I would *like* him to use two weapons.... I would like for him to be at least somewhat useful... Any interesting gimmicks...

But note, he never says you need to reveal the die roll, just that using it 'can' negate a Nat 20.