Search results

An unreleased product (VTT) doesn’t need support staff yet.

I want to see someone come up with the Duck Season Rabbit Season gif but swap OGL deauthorized!/OGL reauthorized! With WotC vs Community.

Someone should create a Twitter bot that deauthorizes the 1.0a OGL at midnight then authorizes 1.0a for another 24 hours. Edit: or in an I’m Spartacus move everyone on social media add “I authorize OGL 1.0a” in their handle or signature.

Indeed. It is a common tension among shareholders between those wanting long term returns, and others demanding immediate value. In the past few decades short term value stripping has gotten headlines.

This has the feeling of stumbling towards a license to a yet-to-be-revealed Steam-like digital toolset with a lock in that what is created under this isn’t promiscuous on other platforms.

The open question might be whether new material will be allowed under 1.0a.

Yeah, we’ll see if the OneOGL also says the 1.0a cannot be used for new content. But a parsing of that could make that plausible.

This seems the core language. “The next OGL will contain the provisions that allow us to protect and cultivate the inclusive environment we are trying to build and specify that it covers only content for TTRPGs. That means that other expressions, such as educational and charitable campaigns...

Finally, something. https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/1423-an-update-on-the-open-game-license-ogl

Yup. A PC currently runs a Titanheart Sorcerer from an Arcadia issue. The characters made abundant use of stronghold and retainer rules from Strongholds and Followers. I’ve customized magic items nearly every loot trove with magic items that have “+”s using some 3rd party magic item...

I have learned a ton from the ENWorld lawfolk, I am eager to read their analysis of this creative license.

I had no consideration about DMs’ casualness amount. I allow them to self-identify their casualness as they desire.

Fair point. But I didn’t want to get into dividing definitions with walls about what the fuzzy “casual players” mean. Not worth IMO it if we have a charitable, inclusive, open mind.

There’s another thread about jumping to other systems. I didn’t invent this, some on ENWorld have already said they in the planning already. Because I didn’t say “some DMs” didn’t mean I meant “all DMs”. I’m asking those who are making those plans due to the leaked OGL 1.1 reasons.

It looks like the 1.1 OGL leak is inspiring DMs to run future games with different system rules. How are casual players responding to DMs who are moved about what’s going on in the community? Are casual players pushing back against DMs making changes due to all this?

I’m glad I was able to get a copy of the Talent playtest when I did.

I keep returning to this thread thinking each update is an actual WotC statement.

Until OGL 1.1 is updated (Spanish Inquisition meme)

The portions that allow WotC to take your material released under OGL 1.1, not pay you anything, themselves republish and profit on it, then exclude you from using the license and your material, kinda feels like reverse uno. The Reverse UnoGL?

https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/