Search results

One of my players has an elk animal companion, it has a pretty mean grapple check. It doesnt even have hands. It still grapples pretty well though ;)

Since it is only a small use of a minor spell and it cannot use any other functions I'd say they can be priced very low. Plus the fact that they have no combat use at all. There are many items which are priced very cheaply because of that. I'd have to say that any single, limited use of...

A recent rules debate I have seen is about whether or not a warmage can benefit from the rainbow servant prc. Not to try to distract from the debate currently in process of course ;)

well, psionics 3.5 is in the SRD, so no need to pay any money ;) But if you arent useing it then that is your choice.......... lol And here I had a suggestion that uses it, too bad.. its fun to be able to learn a little about everything and everyone and just haveing lots of general use.

what sources can be used?

given the nature of craps vs the nature of d&d I'd have to say that the +2/+4 comparison is completely wrong ;) +2 change in craps is 'huge'. You'll never roll a bad number and the vast majority of the time you will win on the first roll. A +4 at that point will almost never matter. However...

It says that the levels stack with any paladin levels that the character has for determining the mounts characteristics. Personally I'd let the guy have the mount ::shrugs:: it would be much more clear cut if it said that they gained a mount if they did not already have one and that the levels...

yep, it is a powerful combo. text overrides the table, so they get full progression. He gets access to a large number of spells. Likely it is too strong for the warmage, but as written.... Then again, compared with the normal cleric anyway.. ;)

Unfortunately not. They tossed on +3 natural armor and gave them scent. Couldnt make them LA +0 after that ;/ Make it +1 natural armor every 5hd and it'd probably be ok. If not make them have to spend a feat to get scent. I do believe that there were lesser versions of the planetouched that...

Note that while this is true it has nothing to do with the question I asked ;) But this part is not true if you are going to agree with hypersmurf :cool: Sounds good hypersmurf. I shall remember this in the future for random construct creatures... I am sure I can come up with a way to...

Depends on how the dm rules it. I havent seen enough raw to support either side to say that it is anywhere near definative. Both constructs and living constructs are immune to energy drain but not directly negative levels. Given the 'living' condition I doubt many would have a problem with a...

and one can be permanent while the other is temporary. The overall effect seems to be 'exactly' the same but one tends to last longer than the other, hence the 'sap' vs 'suppress'. The first lasts a long time and might last forever whereas the second is completely temporary.

well since I doubt they would want regular constructs 'dieing' from negative levels I would assume the 'intent' was for energy drain to encompass negative levels. However, argueing intent is usually leads to madness. Even the one who made the call originally might not remember the actual...

Interesting ;)

for reference:

empowered enfeeblement at that level would be (d6+5)*1.5 it is definately powerful against the right sort of opponent, such as those with strength scores and carrying things ;) Check out the encumberance rules though, I think they will tell you what you need to know about what happens. (I...

Odd.. last time my players used this nifty little rod I gave them there 'were' a lot of butterflies around them suddenly.. they must be an artificer! ;) But yes, arcane spell failure only applies to arcane spells, and only those arcane spells which have somatic components. It doesnt get much...

That would be 'extremely' powerful. I think that the most I would allow would be if each took a feat that worked something like each additional guy makes the total go up by +1 if they met some condition (or maybe count the lowest out of all trying to add in and then add it up from there...

Check and see if any want to play marshals from the minis handbook. There could be some 'incredible' synergy going on! (one bard, two marshals with different auras = huge potential)

No worries, I know what it says ;) But there are times when it is 'litterally impossible' to have the exact same bonus (higher ground vs lower ground, bane working vs not working, true strike vs no true strike, etc) that the 'same bonus' they are talking about must be the same 'bab' bonus of...