Search results

lol @ statistical anomaly

I'd ban any rule that says "your PC can't be Evil" Non-Good enough for Belkar is Non-Good enough for me. Everyone seems to play Lawful Stupid or Chaotic Retarded in those games. My Lawful Evil fits well into any party...as long as it suits me. ;)

Here's an idea I've been kicking around while reading this thread: Has a few steps though.. Go with the 3ft square idea, convert all movement to that scale. Take Iron Heroes' idea of 1/4 of your movement counts for no AoOs instead of the 5ft step. (though the 5ft step needs adjustment as well)...

Actually, the rules say that the benefits of two weapon fighting apply when you throw a weapon with each hand, so swing sword, throw, throw isn't even covered.

thud? The invisible wall is one of the funniest things to happen to my characters. Jump over the pit, hit the wall in the middle. Hilarity ensues.

In a cavern, in a canyon, excavating for a mine...

Just put in the Deck of Many Things and hope they draw the right card. :p

Hmm, long sword, dagger, dagger... Well, looks like your three weapon fighting puts you at -10 for all those offhand attacks. English is a fun language. ;)

I think what he means is: How can you fight with 2 weapons, with only 1 weapon?

3PK (because 300 was a TPK)

Actually, if Two Weapon Fighting works how Hypersmurf says it does, then you'd also have to take the -10 to all attacks you make with that offhand weapon. Although, it does say -6 with all your primary attack or attacks, and -10 with your offhand attack. (singular) So your offhand 'flurry'...

If you are holding the sword in one hand, and wish to make an attack with the sword using the other hand, then the sword is not drawn, in relation to the hand that you wish to be wielding it. Therefore, you must draw it into the hand with which you intend to make the attack roll, using the...

Transmuters! Wizards in Disguise (comes out July 4th :p )

Well, then, why don't we just introduce a feat, called Juggle Weapon Fighting, which lets you juggle a weapon and pretend it is two weapons? If we're going to make stuff up, why don't we just go for the gold?

I C, like the old Shadowrun initiative worked.

Diehard, with Avenging Strike

yes, you certainly can. you can take you swift action any time during your round you want to, such as attacking 2 times, casting Quickened Truestrike, and attacking a third time. A Marshall ready an action to give everyone a move action before one or more of your attacks. A Warblade could attack...

how is that faster than round robin? we just write down everyone's names and the NPCs 1 to whatever on 3x5 cards and flip through then in order of initiative. goes pretty quick, and after a round or 2, everyone knows where they are, or the initiative person says who's next, and who is after...

It'd be much easier to just remove the things that are giving all those stackable bonuses. Math isn't really that hard, keeping track of the 50 things affecting your rolls is where the problem lies.

I had a monk character that started a flurry of blows, hit an adjacent opponent with my first 2 attacks, killing him, then drew a shuriken and threw it at another opponent at range for my third attack. On the other hand, literally, manipulating an object is generally a move action, so unless...