Search results

How does fluff get out of date?

What do you think specifically about the "lite" 4e rules encouraged this above-average role-playing?

Well, I really wasn't talking about the WotC boards; you're right in that I have no experience with them. I was referring mostly to ENWorld. In any case, I just find it hard to believe that so many people would "hate" D&D v3.5 and yet still play it and that it would remain the most popular RPG...

Posters who talk about hating D&D v3.5 really make me shake my head in bewilderment. What have they been doing here on the boards for the past several years? Ranting about their undying hatred of the game? If so, I haven't seen it. Maybe they just all joined up here to talk about D&D after...

I will wait until I actually read and play the full version of 4e before I decided whether it has ruined anything regarding v3.5. I am quite sure that the new system will have just as many quirks as the old, once it has been driven around the block a few times. As an aside, I guess I'm an odd...

I wasn't aware that the posted link was considered journalism. Heck, I wasn't aware that journalism had to be neutral.

Yes, but this is certainly a...unique...complaint about the dragon's appearance. A silly complaint in my opinion, but at least it gives me an opportunity to be silly as well. :D

Bards? What are those? :confused:

That's just what they WANT you to think. The horn that all green dragons sport is actually the result of one particular ancient specimen having angered the Trickster god, who made sure that from that time forward green dragons would be ridiculed for being the dorkiest looking dragons in...

No. Send your money to me instead.

I won't argue with that, but as has been pointed out many times before, the online community really doesn't seem to amount to much.... Which makes me wonder once again at the wisdom behind basing so much on the Digitial Initiative....

I still don't think that's what he was talking about (and what I was referring to), but for what it's worth, I agree with you in this regard--dual statted books and the same books done for different game systems don't seem to do very well.

I didn't think that Lord Zardoz was talking about dual statted books but rather a company producing books for both 3.5 and 4e....

Why?

Thanks! My real confusion was over your wording. There are way too many verbs in that sentence....

Hmmm?

Sure they can.

Hmmmm.... *ponders*

I wondered about this kind of arrangment as well, but IANAL (although my mother wanted me to be one) so I'm not sure how it would work. By the way, thanks for letting WotC know about this loophole--I'm sure their talking with their lawyers about it right now. :p

And 4e wouldn't have existed with Iron Heroes, which was only possible due to the OGL. So it's more of a symbiotic rather than parasitical relationship.