Search results

Ah, yes. I thought the same thing. Probably a genetic quirk in the race, with an unbalanced gender birth ratio. It's bound to affect their social view on spousal hookups.

Can we use the term, "sucks ass," on this board? Seems sort of crass. Maybe we can soften it to something like "siphons buttucks?"

Which of the races do you think would be most likely to embrace a polyamorous lifestyle? (For those of you with innately naughty minds, the term doesn't refer merely to sex -- it's about full, loving relationships with multiple partners.) Elves are usually sorta touchy-feely about being one...

I still think the ranger is broken. Anyone disagree? Yeah?! -- Well, you're WRONG! (I can polymorph into a troll as a spell-like effect at almost any time of the day.)

... Aaaaaaand that's about it. The responses so far have hit all the high points: fighter/rogue, UA variants on each, Able Learner feat et al. Beyond that, you're getting into pretty esoteric, homebrewed arrangements.

Have you ever noticed how tall giraffes are?

'K. No, it's nothing more complicated than material for discussion's sake. ... Our most beloved characters can survive for many years, after all, and sometimes important records or addenda can be lost -- or accidentally modified. "Core" or professionally published materials provide a fairly...

Dude! Don't insult. I could just as easily guess all sorts of rude stuff about your thought processes, too. But that would invoke the wrath of moderators. Love. Peace. Brotherhood.

I appreciate the feedback on the balance issue. But how much trouble is it in actual practice to keep track of homebrewed class modifications, especially over several levels of adventuring?

Is it worthwhile for the gaming group (players and DM) to agree on variant spell lists for core classes, ala the sorcerous witch from the DMG? Once you start the process of substituting this spell for that spell, who gets the final say and does the final product still end up balanced? And is it...

There are a lot of quirky names out there that stick in my head for no good reason, regardless of how "silly" they might have seemed at the time -- Amazon.com and eBay, for example. Google, Yahoo, BoingBoing? (And in fencing, it's askFRED.) The more that people joke about GleeMax here, the...

I disagree. It should be part of the registration process.

:lol: Sweeping, insulting, entirely wrong, you say? Dang those pesky generalizations. They pop up in the darnedest places. (But for the record: I'm right. :p )

Pictures of the hot, nekkid, elf chicks we have met or will meet on our adventures.

Yep. Sometimes too many options cause as much of problem as too few. There's an optimum balance somewhere between limited class character design and wide-open design. ... Unfortunately in the case of the latter, people end up blaming the math instead of realizing they really just want someone...

Math hard? Those people should stop treating those who can add, subtract, multiply and divide like they're some sort of mutants ... or masterminds. :p

Driddle Lingus the Cunning Eric Noah Buga-- ((scrolls back to read instructions)) Oh. Nevermind.

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/prc/20061121a Your feedback, please. Has it been a good class in general? And what are your ideas for entry prep?

I could do without another magic class. What made the original I.H. concept so nifty was that spells were an afterthought to the main focus of martial character actions. Yes, yes, yes -- I knooooow every rule is optional. I just don't like the spiritualist addition. It's like packing a second...

LARP it, baby! Just don't try to play the Human Torch. Very bad idea.