Search results

Hmm.. probably 'Stories of the Street' by Leonard Cohen. Of course, varies with mood.. but probably that one overall.

Originally posted by ColonelHardisson: On the polls here, there's a View Results button you can push before voting, to see the results. I didn't happen to notice if this poll had such a button, but all the others have, so I would assume this one did as well.

27 February 2003, at 3 PM Central.

I haven't played 3e either. I'd like to, but I don't know anyone else willing to DM, and I dunno if I've got time for two regular games. Still, it'd be nice.

I got her a bread machine. Thankfully, I like bread.

Appears to be: jimbutler@bastionpress.com His company is Bastion Press, at http://www.bastionpress.com

I agree with Mark, for he is the all-knowing and all.

Ahhh, sweet Quincy, a fine town. My mother was from Quincy, been there many a time.

I've got a half-beagle, half-something-else sort of dog. He's not all that bright, but he's very friendly and pleasant, and for some weird reason, rarely makes any noise. In my experience with viszlas and Australian shepherds, they need a pretty large amount of exercise, or so it seems...

What if we don't particularly -like- our local game stores, though? Heh. Mine's not very friendly.. after my most recent shopping experience there, I guess I'll go back to not shopping there for a while. Bleh.

Hmm.. whatever edition of Basic D&D had a red cover. I still have the book, but alas, the cover is long since fallen off and disappeared. At least, I think that's the oldest. I have the original Traveller box somewhere around here, too.

Of the major non-evil religions in my campaign world (thus far), two of them are heavily based on deception.. so I don't describe any afterlife, as finding out about this deception is kind of what's going on right now in the campaign.. I think I'd only describe any afterlife for a PC if they...

Having clearly become miffed at Horacio's failure to rise to the lame troll attempt, calls Horacio by some sort of obscure French insult, clearly unaware that he is not, in fact, French. Posts a third-party, unsubstantiated, five-year-old example of why his original position was correct all along.

Though my players would probably rather choke on their own tongues before getting into any sort of seduction roleplaying, I'd say that it would depend on the circumstances.. basically, what the Hound said.

Restates his position yet again, distortion effect finally mutating said position into a meaningless set of paragraphs, which could really mean almost anything and could be used to support either side of the argument. Ridicules people who cannot see the simple clarity in this explanation...

Ignoring Baraendur, ridicules Baraendur's more popular handle as an individual who clearly cannot tell a troll from reasonable, earnest discussion. Say something complimentary about the Dutch, extolling Robbert Raets as a fine example of the type of person that makes the world a better place...

Adding nothing to the discussion, returns quickly to point out a spelling error in Baraendur's original post. Makes smug superior remark, departs.

Point out to Baraendur that religious discussion is barred per rules of the boards, and that members of his background and upbringing probably shouldn't speak in public, lest they be exposed to the ridicule of all. Repeat original points in a slightly altered fashion, which subtly changes their...

You are wrong, and moreover, you are wrong in a manner that not only makes you appear to be a bad person, but also showcases your obvious negative qualities. Clearly, my equally controversial and inflammatory position is superior.

Bah, and here I just thought you skimmed the poll too quickly.. Foul gnome! Begone with thy trickery! ;)