Search results

Double posty-post-post

I gotta admit. IMO, this is one of the most inane rotes currently coming out of certain camps. Really? It's an optional rule? Yes, we know, "it says so". But what rule isn't an optional rule? Point to any rule in the PHB that is not optional. So, let's play a game where the setting allows for...

Someone who speaks two languages is called bilingual. Someone who speaks many languages is called a polyglot. Someone who speaks only one language is called an American. I'm one of those last ones. So your translations would do me little good. Smaller words maybe? So if you could just please...

I was very much in the "I really don't think I need something like this" camp. Insomuch as I even read the thread and skipped posting originally. Then I came back after a while and read all the contributor posts and how great you guys sound. Passionate. Helpful. Friendly. Taking feedback...

Would you go so far as to say you have a very black-and-white opinion of black-and-white opinions? ;)

You don't just let the one player tell the other how their character's words should be interpreted? You make the dice inform each other? Like, instead of: "My wizard tells your barbarian to go eff off, but in a joking way. Cuz we're buds who can talk to each other like that." You prefer: "My...

Easy answer: The DM decides it is so. Seriously, if its a campaign specific thing that wizardly magic is capable of raising the dead, just add it.

I'm not seeing it. FS is a "divine caster" built on an otherwise arcane caster chassis. Not really a blend of magic from both such that the OP is asking for. Though I could see, opening up the FS spell list to include both its own and the core sorcerer list would definitely do that. Regardless...

Watch it, bub! Don't you dip your facetious little toes in the Blood War pool, lest you find them bitten off most heinously!

Wizard/Cleric multiclass.

Don't what? Say the things you said? Or believe the things you said?

Because you keep saying things like... ...that's why.

Because wearing black while hiding at night makes being a ninja too easy. Real ninjas need the challenge of wearing white. Yeah. That's how hardcore they are.

Speaking of transforming... At some point they need to announce -- in unison -- to the PCs, "We grimlocks, SMASH!" Just sayin'...

So how do you get from there to the part where you say that the internet voices were ignored? If you believe the vast majority of howler monkeys were also involved in the surveys, that's where their voices were counted. Or are you saying some people should have been given more than one vote, by...

Nod. I'd go so far as to say, anyone who takes anything D&D-related too seriously is missing the point.

Heck, the devs made a point of not participating in their own company's discussion forums related to the very product they were working on. For various reasons. What you describe being just one of them.

Are you of the opinion that there were people passionate enough to post opinions online that were not also contributing to the playetest feedback? And if so, in large enough numbers as to be significant?

Or even just a door with two or more locks. The spell only undoes one of them per casting. How many slots are you willing to expend to get through that door, spellcaster?

Huh. That's odd. I wish my memory of details, and/or my desire to spend the time researching for that matter, were stronger. In either case, I would bother to list a few items MM specifically identified as being included in the final product that his personal preferences ran counter to. But...