Search results

And he kept burning his jockstrap, and getting other drows to do the same.

Gah. Once I get poisoned and die horribly, my new soldier will be a short nervous fella, very quick and with good aim. Oh wait! I have a good Fort save! YAY! :)

OOC initiative check (1d20+0=2) Aw geez.

I've played quite a few of those, and amazingly, that includes HoL (and yes, we realized it wasn't really intended to be played. A game that had always been on my list (and I have no clue if it's still in print) is Kult, but I apparently will get to play it in a PBP in a few weeks.. Yay!

Assuming he then burned it, he did you -and the world- a huge favor, man. :p

Normand silently follows orders, watching his steps, making sure the ground is solid under each foot before putting on his full weight down on it. OOC spot check (1d20+1=9)

I'd suscribe to the "Chess set offer!" mailing list if that means I'd get sent Dungeon or Dragon. Am i reading this backwards?

Realize that those are examples garnered from a quick look at the previews from WotC's website.

Yeah. I'm sorry. I failed to realize that saying that something gave a bonus to natural armor but didn't stack with existing natural armor made sense. I'll be right out buying the book, because the editing was excellent.

That'd be a good explanation if there was no way to write it to make it not stack without that line. Sadly, there is, and so they messed up.

No, we have a bonus to natural armor not stacking with the natural armor it gives a bonus to. Granted, the rest is not mechanic errors. Just sloppy editing. Well not the evocation thing, that's another poster's beef.

No, having nitpicky players demand, you know, well-edited books? How am I the bad guy for demanding mechanics that hold together? From the PREVIEWS FROM THE WOTC WEBSITE, no less. Note that I didn't bring that up, someone else did. Are all the errors I brought up excused in Complete Arcane...

Not really that nit-picky, especially if you have nitpicky -players-. Perhaps "sloppy" is a bit strong. But when you use a well-established mechanic (spell-like ability) and include an exception (it has arcane failure), it has the high potential of leading to hassle and problems down the...

But apparently the editors barely got the time to look at it.

Ambrus: i did spot that one, but they state in the class description that on that one angle, the invocations work differently from other spell-like abilities, so I gave it a pass, although it's sloppy mechanics. The only pestering that'll work is not buying the books. And while I've seen...

Of course kobolds aren't mentioned, since they aren't a base RAW race. And it does seem like the book was somewhat rushed, since I saw two stupid wordings by simply perusing the preview. First, under Abilities they say And then under Weapon and Armor Proficiency they say That's just...

I don't believe his business is in the gaming industry, but I could be wrong.

"Sure doc, that's what they pay me the big bucks for, eh?" Headed towards the tomb, Normand frowns. "You know.. A tomb would make an awesome place to hide weapons. if you were a fell."

My players roll their damage even when I tell them "He had 1 HP left, you do a minimum of 26. He's dead." So no.

Bah. I'm a french-canadian living in the states that frequently goes back "home" to Montreal. The price of everything is higher in Canada. Some things, like cigarettes and gas, is due to higher taxes for health/environmental/life-style reason. Fine. Many other things have little obvious...