Search results

I like drunkmoogle's description of how it works better. So let's house-rule it to say:

That's something I hadn't considered. One of things I liked best about the 3E ranger is that it had no alignment restrictions. If hadn't already made up my mind to use martial versions of the prestigious paladin and ranger, the last two posts alone would have sold me on the idea. Which...

Only if you consider the cloak and the elixer to be of the same circumstance. -DMG, page 21

Have you considered a non-leathal poison?

On a semi-related note: Would you allow the gnome crossbow sight from the Arms and Equipment Guide increase the 30'-range for precision-based damage?

I like that definition. It's easy to apply.

Never hurts to err on the side of caution, because there are some would interpret it the way you phrased it. Well, then you're in luck! Because you have no penalty up to 240'.

"X manifests ______"

Is it just me, or does 3rd-level Cha adjustment for gnome/svirfneblin seem off?

Fiend Folio has creatures called Feytouched, and it has the Half-Fey template.

No, it was pseudo-Middle Earth.

Kill them all, and take their stuff.

Whew! When I looked at the title I thought She Who Shall Not Be Named was going to buy back TSR. Ok, so maybe I over reacted.

I always thought class skills should be dependent on both class and background. If you grew up in a sailing town, profession (sailor) is always a class skill no matter what classes in which you take levels. Call them background skills instead of class skills.

I mean non-spellcasting. Spell-like abilities are fine. The Complete Warrior introduced variant classes for the paladin and ranger. They lacked spells but had other abilities to compensate the loss. I'm just trying to create PrC versions of those classes. Those are some good ideas. Just...

If you can somehow get an Int and Dex of 15+ apiece, manage to grow a second head, and gain at least three natural attacks, there's Multivoice from Savage Species. It it allows you to cast two spells, two spell-like abilities, or one of each of those each round. It has good number of...

I thought falling was a move action.

No, not quite. It doesn't increase your range increment. It's still 80' with the max range being 800'. It reduces your penalty due to range "as if [your targets] were two range increments closer." It's not the same thing. Again, it doesn't add two range increments. The max range doesn't...

While we're on the topic, what free actions do provoke AoOs? I can't think of any right off hand.

Then you should have required both.