Search results

Hey, just saw this today: Ancient Humans May Have Managed Fisheries: Discovery News

It would be one thing if Dr. Midnight were more regularly running 4E or even anything at all. But somebody who just plays once in a while? Is it worth having an experiment in the session? No, I don't feel that to be the case. Besides, in a longer campaign, you can always say "Ok, that rule...

Well, I would point out this article on Domestication: Domestication - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia That'll give you an idea of what animals and plants are available. Other aspects of the game would vary. Of course, you could also borrow a page or two from the Pliocene Epic. Since you...

Beware the dreaded Sea Cow!

Godslayer--I have slain the last of the false Gods! Now I am the one true God! DemonLord--Have you now? Is that what you believe? Godslayer--Question me do you Fiend, well my mighty sword has tasted the Blood of those who claimed to be divine, it shall not balk at yours! DemonLord--Oh, but...

Dead. So Neutral, pending the determination of the fate of his soul.

Now that's something of a reason. However, I think the problem with your solution is that it puts a chain on the players rather than encourages them. I prefer carrots rather than sticks myself. Unless you thought of it anyway. Which you might have, depending on the result of the roll and...

Human?

There's a new version every time somebody says..."I'll do things this way" . While in some cases by pure chance, two individuals may make identical changes, according to the by-laws, we still have to count them twice.

Mind if I ask for this to be firmed up a bit? Mostly because I'm not that familiar with these systems, so I'd like to understand where you're going with it.

I am not entirely sure of this. Certain creatures, like Angels, are Any in the MM1, but Unaligned in the MM2. Makes me wonder. It's often information that I completely ignore and find somewhat distasteful to see included. But then, I felt the same way when seeing the description of Elven...

Ok, so why do you like requiring it? Can the GM not get a desirable result without being so restrictive? Do you find the idea that "It's nice if the player can describe things, and let them matter, but the GM don't have to require them" unacceptable as you indicated you did earlier? If so...

Yes, I believe it's supposed to be part of PHB3.

It seems you are confused. Let me assure you, once more, I am not particularly concerned about LostSoul or myself in particular. My concern is the logic in general. Did this escape you? Did you somehow interpret the pronoun usage as literal ones? Well, they weren't. Sorry if you got...

So...you are standing by your adamant requirement of it? Or am I misunderstanding what you're saying? If so, then, ok, we're back where we were 2 pages ago. Why? What is the reasoning that the system or the GM must be that restrictive? I am not asking for you to explain how one can...

Never seen it, so can't play with it. Ah, something I do know. Harry--Chaotic Good Herm--Lawful Good Ron--Neutral Good Snape--Lawful, partially Evil, partially Neutral even Good. Draco--Neutral Evil Dumbledore--Chaotic Good Voldemort--Chaotic Evil Buffy--Chaotic Good...

Indeed there is. Myself, I'm quite comfortable being in the middle ground, with either extreme coming up as they may. I'd advise not completely cutting it out myself. Seems a lot of trouble with no discernible benefit. Of course, the only people I've seen cutting it out are those demanding...

This is the general RPG discussion forum, you probably want the one for 3rd edition, which includes 3.5 You may also want to ask about Mutants and Masterminds, as that is a d20 based Superheroes game. That's where your previous post was already moved, if you didn't notice.

Nobody has decided to add their own??

Well, that would be fine if you had expressed it in terms of preference, however, your past replies did not contain such. They went in another direction, namely that of requirement. Are you now saying you misspoke? Because I don't think I misunderstood you quite that badly. Did I? Because...