Search results

I am not completely sure how the Channel Positive Energy to Harm Undead works for this character. I was hoping for some help with this. Here’s my hypothetical, starting with relevant attributes: Levels: Cleric 1 / Paladin 4 Stats: Charisma 18 (modifier +4) Trait: Sacred Conduit (+1 on...

I am running i think the 6th session of an evil campaign this week. The players arent undead, but humanoid races (2 human, hobbo, drow, kobold n orc) What we have learnt: They dont like paladins NPC's get creamed by the priestess of gluttony and her selected channelling of lots of damage she...

in the scope of the adventure, does its ECL matter? is it going to be a PC at some point? i dunno, maybe your getting to complex from the off

UK 3 The Gauntlet is "capture the castle, then defend the castle"

leave D&D as it is, no matter the version play something else that does what you want it to do There are ssssssssoooooooo maaaaaaannnnnnyyyyyyy rpgs out there, dont mess them , try something different and more suitable

david tennant, the current (just) dr who, should be bilbo

a PF campaign I run have 3 players, and an occassional 4th TBH they are having no problems with low numbers as the characters have so much more options now. If for example someone takes the 'rich' trait, they can start off with a few MW items each and a WOCL as long as you have fighter or...

yep, wife was very kind 9 paizo products and Dominion:Seaside from the FLGS

Duty and Honour has a sleek and simple card system for its mechanic ominihderon games

prestige should be for flavour or if a 'power-up' in a narrow band heres hoping my wizard/fighter gets to hit eldritch knight next year But as other have said, there is so much goodness sticking to one class PrC is no longer an obvious choice, .

Hes wearing a robe cos his balls are so big!!! . intentional or not, thats a great line

Im gonna disagree a bit Adding too much flourish is a bad thing in combat 1. Its slow it down 2. It therefore makes the combat last longer 3. it therefore makes combat too important a % of the session 4. I like games where defence is a static number. keeps its simpler, will utterly abandon all...

Like the inquisitor, alot dislike the alchemist and greatly dislike the tactical feats. They are both very 4th ed feel to them, and its not what i wanna play

Playing RAW in two campaigns....good guys starting with Everflame/Hollows mix, have nealry hit 4th and bad guys in a hombrew campaign world, and have hit 3rd 10 observations 1. Have played maybe 10 sessions in total 2. Enjoying all the little bits n pieces boost, like traits and powers from...

in some ways 4e is a bit easier basically every power is the same and every class very similar Calm Down like the poster above 1e has some very wierd mix-matches for mechanics cf to roll d20, add some stuff BUT the killer in 4e is that everyone of these similar powers does ha slittle bit n...

Static defence is something i need in any 'crucnchy/high combat' rpg i play so keep the AC Savage worlds has static defences and i like to play that 2 Dragonquest has it too and i play that nothing more uneccesary than i roll to hit / u roll to not be hit.

ooh, i do like that

Necroplois 2350 for Sav Worlds does this you have PC's...but each gets extra 'resources' such as squad of extra troops

somewhat less than 3e/4e -I want it to be so i dont need anything electronic to make a character sheet, in a decent time. -i dont need to print out power cards, and have 15 in front of me when im only 5th level - i dont need a nicely laminated stack of condition cards and a pile of colured...

no more than 1 hours work to change a 32 page 3.5 paizo mod to a PF