Search results

We're cool. :) Yeah, you know, I always liked those articles, too. But our market data says Silicon Sorcery is the least popular of our articles. :( Yeah, I'm not sure exactly about the exact wording, to be honest, so I probably shouldn't comment on this directly. :\ I'll put Josh on the...

Whoa man, did I step on your birthday cake or something? I was trying to address a misconception. I never once thought this was the main issue of the thread. I'm not sure what I did to warrant this treatment? :\ The simple fact is, according to our market data, people hate Silicon Sorcery...

If it was an ad we would have marked it as such. We will not accept money from any company to promote their products except as clearly marked advertisements. We aren't going to mislead you. That is not in our best interest. This piece is no different than any other First Watch piece. It's...

Whoa whoa whoa. Who said it was an ad? Certainly no one from Paizo. It's a preview. An article. We were not paid to run it. In fact, it would be unethical for us to accept money to run an article, and we are not ones to violate ethics. If we are paid for something we will make it abundantly...

Thank you WizarDru, you beat me to the punch. :) We never once intended the FFXII piece to be a review. We never once called it that. It is a preview. It is simply something we thought our readers might be interested in. That it might also help us generate ad revenue so we don't have to raise...

How can there not be elf ninja? :confused: So, believe it or not, no sub levels, no variant class features, and no feats. Like dwarven rogues, we took dwarven ninja as equipment users. So this article is all about specialized gear by and for dwarven ninja. There were feats, originally, but we...

Now THAT's what I want to hear. :D Adventurer: "Mountain Ghosts" (dwarf ninja) by Wolfgang Baur. (Yes, THE Wolfgang Baur.) Arcane: "Unfamiliar Territory" (variant class features) by Christopher Hantzmon and... uh... me. :) Divine: "Wild Shape Guide" (self explanatory) by John E. Ling, Jr...

(Psst... Merric... Wes is also an associate editor.) (Psst (part II)... where'd you dig up my website? :lol: )

What thread was that, Jeff? Was it related to who got their author copies already and who didn't? I've lost my contact info for the guys at AEG and have moved, so I fear my author copies are floating in the limbo of the USPS somewhere. :\

D'oh! We have a thread going over at the Paizo messageboards attempting to compile all the found errors in one place (so we can fix them in some way... errata perhaps?). http://paizo.com/dragon/messageboards/compendium/dragonCompendiumErrors So whenever you find a mathematical error in the...

The dowhar fell to the abominable Kutforspace Monster, as did four of the originally announced sixteen monsters for the monster article. Beyond that I don't know how much got changed, as I didn't do the initial edit.

Indeed, since the editor of the DC I also worked on the SC I and sits 10 feet from Erik Mona (who helped choose what went into the DC I). ;)

It won't be alphabetical.

It's true. Spread the word! Beginning with issue #339 you will find a new and (I hope you agree) improved Class Acts format. :)

It's not so much a matter of me winning as Jason losing. So in that regard, everybody wins (well, except for Jason, of course). :)

*nodding* Oh I'm certain that has nothing to do with it.

Yeah, I wish they'd hurry up and release this. I want an IMDB page, darnit! ;)

It's true. Look for this beginning with Dragon #339, the Campaign Classics issue. :) The new 2-page format allows us to explore ideas more fully or to try whole new types of useful tidbits for you. And yes, expect to see support for the new standard classes presented in the Complete books. :)

Thank you very much! :)

For that to happen I first need someone to actually send me a query for a psionics-based Class Act. The more the better, really. We can't print something that hasn't been written.