Search results

A certain degree of immunity to tyrannosaurus rex attacks?

We generally use % dice, roll under Con to stabalize. No clue why, it's just the way we've been doing it for years.

I'm running a modified version of the Banewarrens, set in Rhukaan Draal, the capital of the hobgoblin nation in Eberron.

Finally, a common spider mini! Edit: And a dolgaunt! :D Double edit: Skeletal Equiceph? Surely there must have been a better large creature they could have picked.

If computer games count, I'd have to say "Daikatana: Best game of 1997/98/99/00" takes the cake.

I don't feel that I'm that good, but everyone keeps coming back, so I guess they must enjoy it. Heck, they were even prodding me to get another campaign off the ground after the TPK last time. Maybe they just enjoy the abuse.

Your first aura, and the one you use for most purposes, should be the one that adds to Dexterity checks and, more importantly, initiative rolls. If your Charisma is high enough, that's like giving everyone in the party Improved Initiative for free. After that, I like the one that adds a...

You could also check out the Character Optimization forum on WoTC's site: http://boards1.wizards.com/forumdisplay.php?f=339

Really, though, it's a DC 5 check. Any player who focuses on mounted combat is going to be able to beat that at level 1 without even rolling. It's a pretty safe rule to ignore.

I think he meant that the wizard turned the dominated rogue into stone to prevent him from attacking the party.

Anyone can do damage during a grapple, by making a successful grapple check on their action.

"Perhaps we could relocate you...to some sort of....camp. Somewhere where you can just kick back and *concentrate*. We know just the place, it's called Mousewitz" - Our failed negotiating strategy with the mouse people in Nascrag.

XPH, pg 18, under "Multiclass Psionic Characters"

I guess I just don't see the difference between holding and wielding. In actual play, do you force your players to worry about the difference? Say the PC has a longsword in his main hand, and a short sword in his off hand. Do you make him tell you that he's "holding" the short sword when he...

You think it's complicated now, try adding in some power attack and burst weapons. I used to need a calculator to figure out how much damage my charging centaur barbarian did. Usually before I got done calculating, the DM would just sigh and tip the mini over.

I don't really wan to get into 5 pages of arguments, but I'll just add that I've always played by the way Jeff seems to interpret things. Ignoring the abiguously worded rules, just think about it realistically. Why should simply holding a weapon in your off-hand give you a penalty if you're...

From the feat: And from the info on splash weapons: I guess the only question is what "unusally massive" means, which is left pretty vague. I wouldn't count a vial of alchemist fire as "unusually massive," personally.

Remember when you used to play telephone as a kid? Maybe the text the PCs find is a translation of a translation of a translation, so the literal meaning is going to be worthless. For example, I cast Comprehend Languages (aka, Babelfish) to translate your original post from English to German...

When you grapple, you do damage according to the natural weapon used to start the grapple. For most humanoids, this would be unarmed strike damage. A creature grappling with a bite or claw would do bite or claw damage.

Not that it adds much to the conversation, but you should have seen the look on my player's face when the BBEG monk used Snatch Arrows to fling alchemist's fire back in their face. It was pricesless. :]