Search results

Headbomb: Ah, as I had thought. Cool! You must have a modified crafting/magic item price system in play, too, or else the difference between building a masterwork item and a +1 item is senseless. Interesting, interesting. My party just hit Lv5 after collecting their first magic items in our...

Frostbite and Thunderclap: Oh, yeah! I wonder why I was thinking that they did. We haven't gotten the chance to use them yet, so they haven't stuck in my mind too well. Headbomb: Oh, yes, that would be perfect! Great design, man! I award you 1.5 buttloads of EXP! Also, is that a masterwork...

Oh, yeah. EE is an official supplement, so it would make sense to add Frostbite and Thunderclap into the weapons. Even looking through the Unearthed Arcana editions, that would mean that we've covered every attack option outside of leveled spells . . . well, except Mind Thrust, but the psion is...

I was about to report a bug in which the Defense Fighting Style was not populating the armor's miscellaneous modifiers, but MPMB already corrected it because he's awesome and stuff. Astro: Oh, yeah, in those areas. Yeah, I had thought of that before, but it didn't solve any space issues that I...

The first page has no space concerns. Abbreviating skill names would accomplish nothing. That did remind me of an idea that I had a while back, though: What if the skill fields were editable, like the last skill, "Tool," is? Say that your DM has some house rule in which . . . uh . . . he mixes...

It's . . . It's beautiful. ;_; EDIT: -facedesk- . . . . . I'm an idiot. I made the tiefling's Hellish Rebuke a bonus action. It's obviously a reaction. I'm an idiot.

Astromath: That is strikingly similar to how I view it. It's likely due to the way that things came up in earlier versions of this sheet. Ohillion: I was able to replicate your problem and found it to be true of blowguns, also. I did just send MPMB another butt-ton of corrections, so he's about...

Excellent! The grammar is mostly good, or it's as close as it can be when given space concerns. I'm lookin' at you, rock gnomes. Most of the issues are in punctuation, of course, but I'm also adding in a few clarifications (e.g. elves and warforged have to take it easy for eight hours, just...

Astromath: If you are willing to wait, you can use my spell sheet. It's not as pretty and doesn't print out that well; it's built for computer usage. If that's cool by you, you're in luck: Because my sheet assumes that you're reading the bloody book, there's a lot less reminder text about the...

I have been too busy to get to much proofreading lately, but I have to add this: + "/n " + "My druid spells don't require verbal, somatic, or free material components" Please add that into the Archdruid description. I could have sworn that I fixed that earlier, but I evidently missed it or...

Excellent work, man! This is amazing. I noticed another nitpick in the feats: Svirfneblin Magic has "Disguise self" with the S decapitalized, but it should be capitalized. You also have a lot of semicolons where there should be periods and new sentence beginnings. It probably became habitual...

Pagus, you enter your weapon selections into the "Attacks" fields and armor/shield in the AC section, then click the button, and it takes the data from there. For example, if my attacks are Light Crossbow, Dagger x2, Handaxe x2, and Eldritch Blast, I enter those, manually type in the "x2"s, go...

Oh, some magic items refresh on a daily timer! Right, right. Good point, Headbomb. Yeah, I agree that a "Day" refresh button would be nice so that we could list magic items in the Limited Features and track that. Cool beans. Astromath, good find, but no, the one that I'm referring to was a...

Good question! Someone cited Mike Mearls on it, but I can't find where, any more. It's probably somewhere on Twitter . . . They seriously need to apply more effort to publishing all their errata where people actually friggin' read it . . . -sigh- It's implied in the Unearthed Arcana: Eberron...

No need for "day" recoveries. The developers already clarified that "per day" should be read as "per long rest." Click on that errata link above to affirm, if you'd like. I already fixed the "day" recovery that was left in one of the class features. With that being said, I just proofread all...

You have a typo, "secundary," in that. I figure that I should say this while it's on my mind: Sorry to anyone that I may've confused with my previous statement about reading "spells" and "cantrips" separately in the rules. Really, you should for all of the instances of known/prepared spells...

http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/ph_errata There ya' go. Yes, Agonizing Blast is better. It also applies to exactly one whole cantrip. This has more variety to it. That's the thing about warlocks and wizards. Warlocks are better blasters, but wizards have a ton more versatility and wide...

Look at all these lines! Yes! I can fix all the things! Okay, honestly, I don't think that there's a whole lot that I can do to beautify the monk (Well, I mean, I have pics of really awesome monk chars, but . . .), but I can clarify all the things, now! Aye, aye, this will work nicely...

MPMB, I ran into an obstacle. I'm looking at Ranger's Companion. This is driving me up a wall. I can't figure out how to put in a note that you can order your companion to move without spending an action. I suppose that it should be assumed . . . or people should just read the bloody book...

Athinar, since you get responses so easily, could you ask them to add this to the errata page? Wizard: Arcane Recovery- Here, "once per day" means you must finish a long rest to use this feature again. EDIT: Oh, MPMB, there's a thought! Maybe you could add a link to the 5E errata page on your...