Search results

The Master of Chains was not reprinted. It is my understanding (through Living Greyhawk) that material that was not reprinted in 3.5 is not longer considered valid D&D material, mechanically speaking. Afterall, someone doesn't have the option of using the 3.0 spells that didn't make the...

I asked this question last year, received no answeres, then went and did some reading on the subject. They are used interchangably with no regard for confusion of the reader. From the SRD: Portable Hole: A portable hole is a circle of cloth spun from the webs of a phase spider interwoven...

Only problem with that approach is that uber stealth is often accompanied by high reflex saves and evasion. Still there are a few non-reflex area effect spells. Glitterdust comes to mind...

As someone else previously mentioned, the Master of Chains from the old fighter/monk book could use it as a double weapon.

Actually, Hellhound does make a very good point about approach. Even if you think the call your GM makes is totally idiotic, be polite and respectful in your approach. However, I stand by my statement on what people will believe is in the rules, or if made a house rule, is fair and balanced.

So the answer seams to be 'Not any more.' Could always ask your GM about a feat or prestige class. Given the hate against spike chains though, I wouldn't cease respiration.

Yup, that ought to work. Why broken though?

The ideas some participants in D&D games get into their heads never cease to amaze me... Good luck, and let us know how this works out.

I have said it before and I will likely say it again, there are other game systems out there for people who like more realism in their gaming. That said, Storyteller is well known for having opinions on what is realistic and should be changed in D&D that are at odds with a solid majority of...

Well, since this is an opinion poll: Bow Strength Yellow Half Full ;)

A little off topic but in the same vein... Several PrCs in Complete Adventurer give darkvision and state that it stacks with any existing darkvision. There are none that give darkvision that don't stack. Should this be retroactively house ruled?

ROFL!

Before 3X: They are hobbits. 'Nuff said. After 3X: All that time spent riding on wagons rather then running around. Yes, laziness. ;)

Actually, since they cannot fly in heavier armors without PrCs or feat expenditure, it does tend to limit what classes/styles are usable. Frankly, having read through them, I don't see them as overpowered, and would consider them underpowered for LA+1 (though not a bad off as hobgoblins). I...

Clearly, you are mistaking this for another poll... ;)

It let's you know what modifiers apply. Granted, they could have said the same thing with 'make a free attack' with some more words...

I don't think it is particularly silly. You may not agree with it, and it may or may not be overpowered depending on your campaign (a certain all-plant BG line-up comes to mind...), but the basic gist is that you can't get any more sneak attacks then you could using an equivelent action. This...

I still think IndyPendant's idea is the best one. It keeps TWF as a style that only the more dedicated follow, while taking away alot of the complaints against it.

Monk: Definately too eastern for typical D&D. Looks like Bard may not survive this round either...

General comment not aimed at anyone in particular, but if the GM runs a game where the most important thing about being a fighter is pure damage output, then they have no one but themselves to blame if people focus on builds for damage over style.