Search results

There's a thread for this. https://www.enworld.org/threads/the-2014-vs-2024-phb-compatibility-thread.704834/

I think the word is that 2014 subclasses not present in the 2024 rules could be still used but may need some tweaking. I guess I am wondering how much tweaking, and who will do it. On the other hand, if a 2014 subclass was rewritten for 2024, the rewritten subclass should be used. Believe I...

One thing I did note was 2014 subclasses that were eliminated in 2024 would still be fine in a 2024 game but that there may be later updates to those subclasses. Wondering how much work will be needed ito use those 2014 subclasses in the interim?

Will 2014 characters work with 2024 rules? Will 2024 characters work in a 2014 rules campaign? Will chocolate ever work with peanut butter? Bring your compatibility questions here!

At a cigar shop years back I found the compiled Traveller originals in the wide format books and snagged all 3 on the shelf at cover price.

Snagged the new Pendragon core rules and Grey Knight campaign.

And that there is no One True Way to run the adventure hook or even the order or contents of the encounters. Nearly every adventure written can be run as a sandbox if you choose not to force the party. That said, there are a lot of folks who enjoy linear adventures. For me, the encounters...

So while I also love the openness of Greyhawk for individual development, I also really appreciate the work that's was in that world previously -- Hommlet, Against the Giants, Vault of the Drow, Tomb of Horrors, Against the Slavers. I never played the later 2e adventures, so maybe it changed, I...

I guess I got to the point where I asked myself "do I want to read volumes of backstory and niggly detail on political machinations between territories, or do I want to, you know, run some friggin adventures?" The backstory can be helpful, as long as it's an inspiration or a hook for a scenario...

I wonder sometimes if those clinging so hard to letter of the law Canon are the same ones who can't actually get an adventure off the ground. Canonistas always struck me as embodiments of Analysis-Paralysis.

Alt covers all the way here.

Working from home, Amazon, streaming TV, food delivery. Brick and mortar is getting decimated before our very eyes.

I call it Pandemic Inertia. It’s changing everything.

it’s also that movies in the theater in general aren't by doing that well right now. And it’s going to get worse. Any future will be in streaming.

I'm just not happy with The Boys story arc after the most recent season. Basically no progress and back to the same situation as the beginning.

Watch Tbe Founder on Ray Kroc sometime. Gygax would make for a pretty fascinating biopic.

I don’t miss cable. At all. But hunting for content across different services is different than clicking through 1000 channels. I generally have an idea what I’m looking for though. YouTube is good for all purpose content.

And Foundation.

I would expect huge artistic liberties to be taken, of course. I'm talking about a light framework with lots of room in the sandbox. So no hand tying other than to make sure it's recognizable as D&D. Fallout had to work within a framework, too.

Yeah it’s important to pick a setting and stick with it for a show. you’d also have to decide whether to play up an established traditional storyline or play up the collaborative nature and story as you go, which is much harder, even unique for prime time. for that, you might be forced to show...