Search results

lol ok. You realize that the rules quote also includes the last phrase which specifically explains that if your movement for the turn is reduced to 15 feet and you take the dash action, your movement increases to 30 feet the same turn right? But anyway, agree to disagree I guess? And to be...

Oh no don't worry, you were right :) Thanks again for linking!

What I would rule at my table isn't the question being asked here, just like how you would rule at your table isn't. The question is more like what's the official intent for how this resolves. You claim to know intent, but you can't possibly prove that you do based on the posts you've given so...

Well said, page 72 of the basic rules explains: Dash When you take the Dash action, you gain extra movement for the current turn. The increase equals your speed, after applying any modifiers. With a speed of 30 feet, for example, you can move up to 60 feet on your turn if you dash. Any increase...

Thanks for posting this link. Although it favors me to simply agree with it, I will still say that Mearls is known to make errors so we should all take the sage advice with a grain of salt. However, on the other hand it is found on the sage advice website itself and so has presumably been...

I'm not making a claim. I'm explaining that your claim, which is that readied actions interrupt actions and movement isn't based off the rules of the game. It doesn't say anywhere in what you quoted that readied actions can interrupt the attack action when there's multiple attacks happening...

True, movement is not actually considered an action by the rules of the game. Page 71 of the basic rules has a list of the available actions in combat. To be clear though, the crux here is that they want reactions to be able to interrupt multiple attacks which are part of the same action...

Well we can't speak to what is or isn't a good example because we're not the devs :) Since we can't agree on what is the correct resolution system for these triggers, we can't say that the examples are good or bad since they work for both interpretations. If it's a question of resolving after...

lol weird post

That doesn't answer if the edition considers the trigger resolving as the action which involves the trigger IE: movement, attack action, casting a spell action, etc.. or the specific attack, act of raising a sword, taking a step as part of moving down the hallway and so on. We do know it's...

no they go to show that the rules don't need to specifically call out that you can't do something or that you don't gain a specific benefit / penalty at all times just because you can sometimes do / gain them.

agree to disagree on that one.