Search results

If you mean that WotC owns the copyright on the text of the OGL (as in the text of the license agreement), you’d be right. But if you mean that WotC owns the copyright on all of the content published under the OGL, you’d be wrong. Very wrong…

Even if the rumor wasn't correct, the longer the delay, the greater the uncertainty...and the bigger the disaster becomes.

Delay is a form of disaster... At least it is in this case.

That seems…uh…to fit the Canadian stereotypes. :LOL:

I wasn't actually expecting anyone to try to answer. Like I said, I was merely documenting the outstanding/debated questions that I saw as well as a few that I thought of. And yeah, I know that some of them weren't very well formulated. I guess my question was around the vague use of...

So what you're proposing sounds a lot like the foundations that run the open-source software community. The Cloud Native Computing Foundation, for example, acts as the overarching non-profit that helps manage multiple open-source projects, and it is supported by the various software companies...

So...if I can try to summarize the outstanding questions... Disclaimer - I am not a lawyer...and every question I post below is mostly rhetorical. I'm just documenting what the questions are. I'm not expecting replies to try to answer the questions as we've had 73 pages of discussion so far...

I joined just to comment in this thread and ask a few questions after I found this while Googling about the OGL 1.1 stuff. And I've read through all 61(!) pages over the last couple of days (at least it was 61 pages when I started writing this). First, thanks to @Steel_Wind @bmcdaniel...