Search results

Cleric Order Domain 12 Druid Circle of Stars 12 Druid Circle of Wildfire 4 Fighter Rune Knight 11 Ranger Fey Wanderer 1 Warlock The Genie 10 ... Ok I missed that. Here is a valid re-entry. Wildfire is interesting if not a top pick of mine.

Cleric Order Domain 12 Druid Circle of Stars 11 Druid Circle of Wildfire 5 Fighter Rune Knight 11 - don't let it rune things. lol. Ranger Fey Wanderer 1 Warlock The Genie 10 There is no green because all the subclasses I like are gone. At this point I am just argue against the ones I want to lose.

Artificer Armorer 7 - I don't understand the artificer hate. Cleric Order Domain 17 Druid Circle of Stars 19 Druid Circle of Wildfire 16 Fighter Rune Knight 24 Paladin Oath of the Watchers 7 Ranger Fey Wanderer 17 Warlock The Genie 12 - wish him into the corn field I would vote against the Rune...

Artificer Armorer 14 - We can rebuild him... faster, better, stronger... we have the technology Cleric Order Domain 19 Cleric Twilight Domain 4 Druid Circle of Stars 22 Druid Circle of Wildfire 18 Fighter Rune Knight 22 Paladin Oath of the Watchers 15 Ranger Fey Wanderer 18 Warlock The Genie 13...

Artificer Armorer 18 - Bob the builder play's D&D! Cleric Order Domain 21 Cleric Twilight Domain 13 Druid Circle of Stars 20 Druid Circle of Wildfire 19 Fighter Rune Knight 22 - over powered! Paladin Oath of the Watchers 16 Ranger Fey Wanderer 18 Ranger Swarmkeeper 3 Warlock The Genie 16

Artificer Armorer 19 - make yourself better thought better building! Cleric Order Domain 21 Cleric Twilight Domain 15 Druid Circle of Stars 23 Druid Circle of Wildfire 22 Fighter Rune Knight 23 - over powered! Paladin Oath of the Watchers 16 Ranger Fey Wanderer 20 Ranger Swarmkeeper 11 Warlock...

Artificer Armorer 19 - All the other good classes are gone. : ( (not as good as the battlesmith) Cleric Order Domain 23 Cleric Twilight Domain 20 Druid Circle of Stars 23 Druid Circle of Wildfire 23 Fighter Rune Knight 26 - It think its overpowered and diminishing other classes. Paladin Oath of...

Artificer Armorer 25 Artificer Battle Smith 13 - Used your knowledge of technique to wield your sword better than your opponent! Barbarian Path of the Beast 16 Cleric Order Domain 24 Cleric Twilight Domain 26 Druid Circle of Stars 26 Druid Circle of Wildfire 26 Fighter Rune Knight 27 Paladin...

Artificer Armorer 26 Artificer Battle Smith 15 Barbarian Path of the Beast 18 Cleric Order Domain 23 Cleric Twilight Domain 26 Druid Circle of Stars 26 Druid Circle of Wildfire 25 Fighter Rune Knight 24 Paladin Oath of the Watchers 22 Ranger Fey Wanderer 23 Ranger Swarmkeeper 23 Warlock The...

By design D&D requires investment of recourses. You can't maximize one thing without minimizing others because the game does not provide the resources for both. I don't mention what is minimized because the conversation is about the optimization / maximization issues the GM is dealing with and...

This is very true. A power gamer pumping out a ton of damage is not going to break an RP session where your talking your way through instead of fighting. Just don't forget combat or your end up chasing off that player... unless that is your goal, which is a bit of passive aggressive way to get...

I agree you have to choose on a session to session basis but I disagree about playing only with people who share gaming priorities. You can have a mix of min/max players, RP players, and strategic players (winning encounters using the world not character options like simply walking around or...

Let me use a separation and define terms here so we are on the same page in discussion of terms. Having insane HP, AC, Initiative, Stealth, Slight of hand, persuasion or any other skill is an Optimizer or often called a Min/Maxer... but not game breaking. Maximizing Damage is usually called a...

But lets be clear, I played a ranger because I wanted to roleplay a ranger... not because the class is any good. Also, I saw 0 complaints about the Favored foe shown in the previous UA because it is universally clear that rangers could use a little bump and it opened up duel sword builds which...

Yes. That is the nature of a conversation. There is no need for me to agree or disagree 100%. I don't think something is broken if by its not broken by default. If there is a way to abuse something, the abuse is the problem. I know about the permanent options you listed, I actually think...

It's a conversation, it doesn't require agreement/disagreement. This is not game of who wins or keeping score. What said was contesting that its broken, and agreeing that its a lot of resources spent for the gain being so situational. So it doesn't matter so much how you calculate it since it...

I don't think it broken unless your character has permanent flight. 1) The build increases range but it does not remove full cover obstructions for line of fire. It doesn't matter if you have target is 30ft away or 1200ft away, if the target has full cover or you are in full cover you can't...

- Deleted. Not important. If a moderator can delete the post I would appreciate it.

If you understand bucklers they do not provide any less defense in melee than a rotella (round shield) or heater (most commonly depicted knight shield like the one used in Zelda). They actual provide about the same melee defense but with better visibility which is why they are preferred for...