Search results

That is just toooo funny... LOL

Maybe model them after Night Elves from Warcraft. I beleive there is even a Warcraft d20 game out that probably has stats for them. As far as I remember, they have a purplish tint to their skin, have glowing eyes, and can act normally in the daylight. They are also a "good" race in Warcraft...

Mid + Night mid: referring to the middle night: The period between sunset and sunrise, especially the hours of darkness Eber + Ron eber: The third post-duluvian patriach after Shem (Gen. 10:24; 11:14). He is regarded as the founder of the Hebrew race (10:21; Num. 24:24). In Luke 3:35 he is...

Has Hype said, this isn't always true. Balance checks can make someone flatfooted, and so can certain feats (the Low-Blow feat from Races of Faerun for one). The other misconception is that losing your dex bonus is the same as being flat footed. This too is not always true. There are certain...

I see there being a lot of evidence pointed to "flanking" not having to be melee only. As much as I'd hate to admit it... That said, I think I will take the safe bet and play it the way it has always been playing (in 3.0). That ranged attackers can not flank (or gain a flanking bonus, if you...

Wow, I'd like to know where you read that, because it is certainly not true. Not in 3.0 or 3.5.

Ummm, you originally said To which, Mekabar replied: So Mekabar is in fact CORRECT that Uncanny dodge (the one you originally mentioned) does not prevent flanking. It is Improved Uncanny Dodge which does that.

I will only quote the relevant parts of the spell as they pertain to my questions. If the creature in the Grease spell makes his saving throw, but does not move/walk, but they do attack (ranged, melee, spell), do they have to make a Balance check? If they take a 5ft. step, do they have to...

Where else can we really go with this? There are several very good ways to deal with this that people have suggested. You are the DM, so imploy them. I personally like the idea about having 1 archer ready his action for one spell, and the other archer ready for the second spell. Then again...

Funny thing is, my DM has house ruled the 3.5 version of Darkness so it works like the 3.0 version. Knowing expressly well that 2 of us in the group are playing Warlocks... Then again, this DM is known for his TPKs so I guess any help he can give us is good. Which is why he also gives us...

What does this mean then: This is found on page 7 of the Complete Arcane, under Warlock...

What happens if I am at 0 and cast a spell that gives me temporary hit points (such as Virtue or Aid)? What happens if I cast a spell or take some strenuous action that increases my Con (netting me only +1 hit points) while I am disabled? If I have damage reduction, does it absorb this 1...

I don't beleive that anyone quoted the glossary yet, so allow me. Some of the wording is slightly different, though I am not sure if it will matter. The last sentence is slightly different from:

I agree with this. If it were to "turn back the clock" (as you put it) then one could argue that you now get an extra move action, because normally you get a move and a standard, and since it was as if you never were disabled, you should now be entitled to that move action. That would be...

I don't see any confusion there at all personally. I only quoted the rules as written. If they seem confusing to you, you are either reading into it too much or the designers did a poor job explaining it, not me. Sorry, but I don't understand what you are saying here. Clarification of what...

It does state that you lose 1 hit point after you take the action, I'll give you that. But what does this mean (p.145 of the PHB): Question... Does a Cure Minor Wounds increase your hit points? It THEN goes on to say... So again I must ask... Does Cure Minor Wounds raise your hit points...

If he steals a divine spell, does he cast it as a divine spell? Or does he cast it as if it were arcane?

It says if you are disabled and take a standard action, you lose 1 hit point. 0+1 = not disabled = no additional -1

Could you take the Dragon Heritage feat selecting one type of dragon (say black) and then go Dragon Disciple and select another dragon (say Red)???

I thought you only get one full round action (attack) per round? And since WWA is one full round to accomplish, and dervish dance is one full round to accomplish... well that is 1 too many full round actions... If this were these case, couldn't you Charge and make multiple irrative attacks...