Search results

Seconded. The curiosity is killing me. Rav

S'mon had a quick NPC creation 'system' linked to in his sig (he might still have it there, I don't know). Works quite well. Rav

Pre revision d20 Star Wars Jedi? Rav

I thought about it a while and didn't get the riddle. Perhaps a slightly more descriptive clue would help. Thundering down endlessly? Perhaps a clue related to water would help too. Rav

You can make a really powerful Fighter/Rogue with a Warrior/Expert, since you don't have to give up your sneak attack progression, since it's based on hide and move silently ranks. Otherwise, they are indeed weaker. Rav

The Psi team. In most setting, the psi factor alone could be a source to party cohesion. It still fills all the roles, no one steals each other's spotlight all the time, and generally seems like a good theme.

An author's views have to be very extreme for me to stop buying his product. With this I mean blatant racism, religious intolerance, or peadophilia (this is not an all inclusive list). And if the author has these views but I don't know about them, c'est la vie. Rav

Fharlagn. I'd be a travelling priest, explaining to everyone that everything is a journey and you'd best contemplate how and which path you are going to take. The true neutral alignment leaves a lot of room for your own spin on that idea. Rav

"Magiër" and, very rarely, "Tovenaar". Ah, bilinguality, I have finally found a use for thee! Rav

Ah, now I remember. I was an ENTP back then. Good search!

You must write it down, but I don't really track encumbrance for anyone that doesn't mind light encumbrance. If you are a 10 strength rogue, using your 30 foot move rate, I'd like you to check up on ecumbrance. Although I'm getting less and less strict, with that kind of stuff moving more and...

Comedy gold! I actually laughed out loud. Rav

The Favored Enemy can be powerful, but usually isn't. The Animal companion is a liability. So that leaves you with the combat styles as something that actually adds easily discernible power to the ranger. Remove both the Favoured Enemy AND the Animal Companion. Replace Combat Style with bonus...

Very good point. I have run several cmapigns with very different flavour in 3.x. Basic and 2e were not a toolbox like 3e is (I haven't played any other editions). I have also had the most fun playing in 3e, because I like the advancement (the "bennies every level") better than the more static...

Same here. Allows for two slightly allround characters, instead of nothing but specialists. Rav

I've allowed them, but I'd be wary of allowing any from Dragon magazine. The Unearthed Arcana ones are harsh enough that it shouldn't matter when you show them to a minmaxer, and will actually come up in play, addin to the fun of the session IMO (ah, my friend's Feeble wizard and his bad, bad...

He did catch the PC druid in the flamestrike. That was one Summon Nature's Ally 3 gone by failed concentration check. The wizard however, managed to stand far enough away. I'm not really ticked off about this singel encounter having gone awry (far too easy for a climax), but with both the PC...

It was a druid, so no protection from evil/good. And the AoO missed, yes. (edit: well, the Druid did get one flamestrike off, so the first round he did do something useful. In round 2 it was all over though - one Bison and bye bye.) Rav

Could http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=163776 be moved to Rules please? It seemed to me that I couldn't report my own post :) Thanks! Rav

Hello friendly people, I just had a session in which a Conjurer summoned a Large celestial bison next to an enemy spellcaster in round 1. So far, so good. However, he then proceeded to grapple the spellcaster. This made the spellcaster all but useless. The allies of the spellcaster would have...