Search results

What? Anyway, don't forget this one from the 2024 Free Rules: "The DM can also decide that circumstances grant Advantage or impose Disadvantage." Which implies that the entire Advantage list can be nullified by a DM-imposed Disadvantage.

That's what it does in 5e. But since this thread is in D&D general, we should probably disregard feats. You're very generous with turn duration!

Unless there's one of those weird, mid-edition errors going on, it looks to me like bows get 50% more range than crossbows. At low level, being farther away from the enemy can be a HUGE advantage (for survivability). Also, bows are much lighter than crossbows. But yes, the x-bows deal a...

Yeah, it sounds like way too much discussion. Unless your players are into that sort of thing. Just make everyone roll, and the highest roll goes first. Then you go around the table, in the direction chosen by the lowest roller.

That might have been a reference to the real world phenomenon of bars getting more interesting after each beer. Aw! You don't allow PCs that use magic, hoard gold, and kill on the daily? The OP observation on rule zero points to WotC suggesting there is one true way: the rule book's way. Can...

"Better" is subjective. How are you using it? Why doesn't the crossbow expert feat meet your needs?

Seconded, except light roasts are the IPAs of coffee.

Discursive RPGs are inherently a conversation. Computer RPGs, not so much. But yeah, discourse is better in person. Don't fret. Some a lot of people form their opinions from what others post online.

It works great in Modos RPG. I suppose D&D could benefit from it, too . . . except that D&D is built on an assumption that everyone gets one or more attack actions per round. Your PCs might get bored. And what if the attack that PCs anxiously anticipated for a round misses? I think you'd be...

And I'll grant an extra bonus action to consume it.

Here, too: https://5e.d20srd.org/

I like to set those expectations up with familiar concepts. So session zero provides relationships and watchmen provide the head bashing. See my theory on WotC breaking it so players can pay WotC to fix it.

That sounds like . . . Boeing. Which is an excellent example of inharmonious. My metric for harmony is generally if I can read through the whole rule book without throwing it across the room. I'll discuss the inharmonious aspects in my next post. Ga'mes Modular appeal to the GM's sense of...

You have to start by making a big deal of it at meetings. Get dramatic about how IMPOSSIBLY ANNOYING it is. Then subtly watch to see who gets the most enjoyment out of it. That person is your target.

Tell me about it. Yah, shoo-er. Paap comes in pints. But we take beer to the lake, not paap, and doont go throwin' no rocks in. You might wake the jaackelope, an' he scares the walleye. Might as well throw yourself in . . .

This is the most likely, given that "books" won't survive the Great Nerd Purge of 2025. I'd pay money to see this. Thanks for the inspiration hero point!

Because it's not 5e anymore?

Oh, the paladin had a talk with the barbarian who was getting all the barbarian-only items. She still wouldn't share. So the paladin gathered up the surplus items while the barbarian was sleeping and left them in a cache away from the road. "A thief must have come by in the night!" It's not...

Funny. I didn't get any emails about my orders getting screwed up. But then, I didn't place them in the first place...? How many orders has Kobold Press canceled?

Always good to have the potential for PC-dismemberment. More selfless would be volunteering to take the place of the wrongfully imprisoned man. Coincidentally, the man was imprisoned in an escapable dungeon. If only he had the skill (and comrades) to do the escaping! Selfless: doing...