Search results

I'm sorry too. Umm, I think Phaerimm is in MM3. Also believe the living constuct thing is in MM3. That is a core book is it not? I also think the shifter is in MM3.

Well, since Archmage was put in core, and red wizard, and more, I'll start there. I haven't looked at spell compendium to in depth, but I know spells were renamed from both settings to be core, from there it's one step. Then we talk about the stuff from Eberron placed in MM3. From FR Pherimm...

You are absolutely right at that sir. They should have held out for more control. But I'll still tend to go with autors though. One thing I notice is that if WotC get's it, it just turns into the same thing as any other setting now. We've got all kinds of Eberron things in core books with...

Maawhaaaahaaaaahaaaaa!

Erik, if you are still around, what are the chances of seeing some of the lords not covered (except in the appendix) in future Demonomicon articles? The ones coming out not are great, I just can't help but feeling the stuff has mostly been covered before(because it has).

Not according to Wies/Hickman. They created the world. I'll stick with their vision of it.

Tiamat has never been in DL. The reason why it matters is that you think Tiamat was part of DL. The creators of said world do not wish to have their vision muddied.

I think most of the creators didn't want them to be part of the wheel. EVER. Greenwood has always wanted to distance FR from the wheel. If you read most of the early novels you can note how much divergence there is from the wheel methodology. Also would like to note that the same is pretty...

So do I, so do I.

That's the way I think of epic support as well. I wish more people thought like that. Any kind new class or addition isn't going to see people jumping to pick it up when they know there is going to be 0 support on it.

Well, at the point of losing that the game wouldn't be D&D any more. There are systems that already support this type of play. I don't see why people feel the need to change a system to be another system. If it went that way, it would very much lose the appeal to me and I think quite a few...

Perhaps, but the changes from 1e to 2e were enough to warrant the new system yet the game was still much the same. Thus the customers didn't feel as much shock and suffer the fracture it did between 2e and 3e. At this time I'm really skeptical of any edition change. There are so many good...

Not a change. I have heard that it is going to be a closed system. No more d20. I just want it to remain an open system is all.

All information has now been assimilated into my database. :D

Crap, It's working now. I just tried close to 20 times. Cleared cache and all. Now it works. :confused:

I'd like to see class acts as it is with one exception. They need to add an entry that takles one of the new classes each month. Binder one month, warlock the next, Truenamer the next, psionic class the next, may an epic class the next. I think it would be a great way to show some suport for...

This seems to be no longer working. Were you able to download stuff?

There was also one mentioned in the appendix of Hordes which was printed in Dungeon but I'm not sure which mag number. It was Kezzit or Kerzit or some such. Lord of the Tome was his title I think. Anyway, I'll get the number when I get home.

How would say a 25% price cut undercut the print market when Amazon already gives %37 off and buy.com gives about 43% off. Yeah, the fact that they have full price makes a lot on sense.

Did someone forget Umbragen, the non-drow drow?