Search results

So, just ignore them. It's just like being teased as a child, the more you it effect you, the more they're just going to continue. I'm pretty sure both sides have had their points made over and over again in this thread. And I'm sure that all the RAW people in here know that the intent is for...

Thanks much!! Haven't even looked at it, but I'm sure that it's better than nothing! Downloading now. And thanks to the original creators for allowing this and trying to accommodate those without MS Office.

I'm about to throw this for a loop. I know dracorat will like this. This is what the rules say, "A blast fills an area adjacent to you that is a specified number of squares on a side." Bold is mine, obviously. Notice that they say "a" side, not every side, all sides, etc. So really, as long...

:D Since OotS isn't upgrading to 4e would you like to start your own version for us? I think it has great potential. Order of the Grid, maybe?

THIS. I own it. And it contains exactly what you are looking for in some respects, especially the "time to craft" info. It'd be worthwhile for you to acquire just for the background info it contains alone even if you don't plan on using the GURPS system.

Probably this, http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/news/20070401b But yeah, about the podcast. The thing that pissed me off the most was the misuse of powers, like the "Pray for More" and there were others as well. Like the warlock attacking the wrong defense with one of her powers...

MordeNkainen Just make sure that's okay under the new GSL , as well.

This came up in another thread and I like the idea of having each PC in a two player party use the rules for adding a class template in the DMG, effectively making them "elite" characters. Don't forget to increase the HP as well and do everything else that you would for an elite. This is...

I believe you meant average the modifiers. But, yeah, I like this method.

True, 4e has so many that this is unnecessary.

Although I do agree with you for the most part. I don't believe there is a rule that states you have to take the multiclass feat at first level. You could take it at any level, retrain for it later, etc. Your character could be modeled by being a fighter until paragon tier at which point you...

Honestly, the easy way to do this is simply to not let the spell happen. The god refuses to power it. A good deity would not let his powers be used in this way. In my campaign, there would be no castings of Holy Word in that area, or it just wouldn't effect innocents (children).

Dungeon has another example of a Skill Challenge in its most recently released adventure. http://wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/dufe/20080613a page 31 (4 of the pdf) The DCs are 18, 22, and 26 which fits the table exactly for 5th level characters. 13, 17, and 21 +5 each. So, that should put...

When calling someone out about their grasp of the English language it's best not to make mistakes of your own. For example, note the capital "E" for the proper noun in my previous sentence and compare it to your own. You also have grammatical errors in your last sentence. And it's ", not '...

Perhaps certain creatures are immune to one of those two effects? Then only the other would apply.

I think your sarcasm detector is broken. Read his comment in reference to the part of your post above after you "chuckled". Especially, the last sentence. You probably still won't get it. Here, I decided to quote it to make it easier for you: "*chuckles* And now I wait to be told I'm...

As others have already mentioned, those rules did exist, they started on page 40 in the 3.0 DMG. I already told someone about that within the past 48 hours, but it might have been in a different thread. Anyway, they were very well constructed and easily adapted to 3.5. We used them several times.

You're right, we've seen that argument 1000s of times, half a dozen in this very thread. So, why don't you try adding something new to the conversation? Repeating HPs are an abstraction over and over again is pointless.

Out of curiosity, how would you classify your own post above?

You should look up the facts of that case. It's not as trivial as you and the rest of the internet make it out to be. I'm not trying to start an argument with you, I used to think the same thing. I just dislike misinformation. Anyway, many of you have mentioned that ability checks should be...