Search results

Well see the goal isn't to cleave the illusionist. It is to have the illusion provoke an aoo from me so I can smack it, make it go away and cleave through to the BBEG. 6 times in a round would be nice so I could use all my AOOs

Even if it was only 17 copper I doubt a puppy counts as a simple weapon ...... hmm how many puppies could I eat in a day .... I am allowed a days rations, and something to carry them in.

We use great cleave in the following manner: If you keep dropping stuff you keep swinging as long as there are foes you can reach without moving.

I didn't know you meant energy resistances, but I knew you didn't mean DR. I just didn't know what you meant.

Awesome since the parties illusionist isn't EXACTLY my posession I can use this as an ascetic. I am pretty sure owning a bucket of snails or puppies would break the vow where as this wouldn't. HAPPY DANCE

I was kind of thinking the PUPPIES would break the vow.

I went looking yesterday because my Brother in law mentioned something that reminded me of the "you want to know if you survive ?" "well I was wearing +1 armor" flash animation that they had up there. But the page is no longer there. I get that big white page with all the text that pretty much...

oh so you are saying that cleave/great cleave + bucket of vermin + combat reflexes wasn't something that was abusable in 3.0 , or that it just wasn't as abusable as whirlwind attack ? Not that I would ever use it, my gaming table enjoyed laughing at the tactic. Besides being an ascetic I don't...

I thought the feats being "broken" were combat reflexes (not whirlwind kick) and cleave/great cleave ?

more on glass from http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_120.html

"Sir it took years but I am happy to report we have finished the fortress to your specifications" "I thank you for all of your hard work and tireless effort" *both walk over and stare at the impregnable fortress* "I have a question for you Mr. Dwarven architect" "Whats that sir ?" "Well if...

The best reason I have been given by the one DM that doesn't allow it is "I am not comfortable Role Playing with you like that" Granted the first and last time he allowed me to was in a mech warrior type game and I ended up in a bar trying to use my feminine charms to make some fairly angry...

Firstly it is my contention that EVERYONE in the "civilized" world role-plays to some extent or another. Very few people (none I have seen though I admit it may be possible some exist) maintain the same personality when dealing with different people (ie you treat someone with authority over you...

I am likely the kind of gamer they are targetting with DRM and like schemes. I am on a budget as is most of the group I game with, we don't want our gaming to suffer but we also don't want to run out and pay $40 to $60 canadian for the newest hardcover book we will end up not using. Mostly I...

I found this place about 9 months or so ago because I was looking for a review of "of sound mind" on google. That search lead to a story hour here. I am not vin diesel but I am Batman. Who called Lexa an idiot and whats her screen name. 8)

Vampire Mage Rifts Robotech Clay-o-rama Shadowrun woof meow battletech Mechwarrior

Barmaids WILL always be female, there are serving boys as well though. Barkeeps can be either gender. Noble Lords do hunt and fight, so do Noble Ladies. I suppose anyone with adequate manual dexterity and wisdom/intelligence could do needlework. Kings WILL ALWAYS be male. Queens can rule...

tee hee hee If we all just "spoke with our DMs" about stuff there wouldn't be nearly as many good threads here. Heck if vindicator had just listened to his dm we would have lost a good 50 pages over four threads of GOOD and ENTERTAINING paladin info.

Of course I can. Me being more chaotic than lawful in RL though prefer to use you as my "sober second thought". Please note "sober second thought" does not equal "The enworlders said I could so I can waaaaaaaaah" "Sober second thought" does equal "well it sounded good what if any fall out is...

I tend to define lawful as "non chaotic" as opposed to "follows all the laws" Although following ummmmm "good" (ie non corrupt) laws is part of it. I lean much more towards the "ordered/disciplined" version of lawful. say it's a society in which open slave auctions are held. So slavery is...