Search results

If you take a 3 inch by 3 inch square (which covers 9, 1 inch squares) and turn it so that a pointy end faces you rather than a flat side you do not suddenly have that same square covering 13 1 inch squares. Yes it may now "touch" more squares that are on a surface that is orientated...

if you rotate a square without changing anything else all you have done is rotate it. The lines didn't grow, the universe didn't bend or stretch.

Dear Ziana take 1 shreddie that has a flat end facing you, Rotate it so that now a corner is facing you. Did the shreddie magically grow ? Cut any sized square out of cardboard and try it. I bet the cardboard doesn't grow either.

So Ziana the new diamond shreddies take up more space than the old square shreddies is that what you're trying to make me believe ? Even the cereal company isn't trying to make me believe that.

so then what I have gathered The new diamond shaped shreddies I see advertised are completely different from the old square shreddies that used to be sold, and aren't just a marketing ploy because squares and diamonds are completely different

Naw screwing over people who word wish poorly is a sacred cow. Miracle is sacrosanct however unless their deity is mischevious.

I think in that case the larger issue is players looking for "the best tool to min/max with" rather than something that better fits their character from a role-playing point of view. Nothing says you need to give them precisely what they ask for but something useful from the correct "ballpark"...

so in this new paradigm where only the bonus matters would you disallow rolling stats all together, or would 4d6 drop the lowest become roll 1d4 6 times arrange to taste ? or maybe roll 1d6 -2 six times so you have the potential of +4 and -1 ?

Even with the same skill level don't they only know the information if they make the DC of the skill check ? Two people at the same skill level could roll a 1 or a 20 isn't it like Schrodinger's knowledge ?

For now. if I recall correctly it will be making a comeback (very heavily revamped) in the book that gives us druids.

Hotel California by the eagles unless you think thats been done to death Sympathy for the Devil by the rolling stones

And just to muddy the waters slightly Copyright applies to things that are "fixed" ie finished and complete. No doubt all three books will have errata and WOTC will revamp them meaning they were not "finished" when they were released.

So Lennox Lewis (for example) facing Bill Gates (for example) and pummeling him into the ground and taking his stuff is the model of life risking courage in your eyes ? Pirates largely attacked unprotected merchant ships on the open seas. They out numbered and out skilled the people they...

Unless a large number of your table owns a laptop (in which case they can likely afford a copy of at least one of the books) or can afford to print off the PDF (which often times saves minimal amounts of money for an inferior product) torrents shouldn't affect sales. Playing from PDF seems to...

Would it perhaps calm some of the teapotted tempest if there was a "deity" of martial ability that granted these boons .. I'm sure someone could stat him up if it would help believability.

Like wolverine and colossus have "the fastball special"

No, well yes but pelted with dice on his way out the door. If player b = "I control your character against your wishes cause raw says" then DM z = "The blue hand of unmaking rips and tears at you" then Host s = "Remove yourself from these hallowed halls thou art no more a knight at this table"...

Tiefling warlord so I can use my infernal background to scare everyone into letting me control their characters muahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Oh wait seriously eh ? Eladrin (maybe tiefling) rogue, dragonborn maybe tiefling) warlord, tiefling warlock

Wahoooo my character is not limited, oh wait he is limited but only narratively. The life he/she lives is in the narrative, if ,as some people want, (not me mind you I am perfectly find hand waving it but some people have been protesting saying that there is no IN CHARACTER explanation for x y...

I dunno about that Umbran, The text of rules that is 3.x appears to serve the people that use a battlemat fairly well and works well for my matless play. I have yet to see anything in 4e that will change this.