Search results

And nobody is going on about how the warshaper prc destroyed their campaign. To tone it down a little require the pc to focus on healing as a swift action.

I dont know that you would keep said tattoo. When you wildshape you are healed. This leads us to belue e new flesh is created rather than a simple transformation. What percentage of new flesh is created is open to speculation but a tattoo formed on bear flesh that reverts to a human shape is...

I don't see any reason to add a +1 to this characters level. He's expending a "Wish" it's SUPPOSED to be an amazing boost.

Really because I was afraid of it coming across as overpowered.

Bat'leth: Exotic Weapon 2d4 19-20/x3 2hnd Slashing and piercing If a proficient wielder forgoes the bonus strength damage normally applied to two handed weapons the Bat'leth grants a +1 shield bonus against melee attacks and when used in conjunction with combat expertise increases that bonus by...

Kill one of them. In the game anyway. This monster... Its what ACTUALLY won the encounter.. Increase its HD, say it gained a level. Give it the leadership feat. When the party returns to kill it have 20 some kobold minions burst out of the woodwork, drop the portcullus and seal them in. Then...

I believe the default use is amongst those otherwise indifferent to you.

If thine eye offends thee, cut it out...

Yup.

I never said powerful characters have to be "uninteresting" but it sounds like she/he/it will just be another combat monkey (or else why make them powerful?) and again... why do we need a "Super Whore" to begin with?

No. You could take a 9th level spell slot and break it down into say 9 level 1 spells, 2 level 2 spells and 1 level 5 spell. If you did that and then also broke down a level 7 spell slot you could add an additional level 4 spell and level 3 spell, or 3 level 2 spells and 1 level 1 spell. You...

They should've made different systems for each school of magic and/or style of casting.

Agreed, and that made the failure of WOTC to really take advantage of them all the more frustrating. Really, the WOTC dropped the ball in that they failed to call the Shadowmage what it actually was or should've been: An Illusionist/Enchanter.

Why does she need to be, and pardon the expression, but "Super Whore"? In fact, wouldn't it be more interesting if she was an average woman with tens across (or similar)? I mean we're sitting here "optimizing" a hooker while entirely ignoring the actual character we're talking about. First...

It's a book almost exclusively about "Mechanics". Consider the amount (and quality) of the fluff in magic of incarnum vs. the quality and fluff of Binders. There's a kind of dissonance there. So... I... uh... make boots out of my... soul power? Incarnum could've been a brilliant system...

This is a failure of your dm more than anything else. Also keep in mind you elected to play a high power campaign....

Precisely... and the frustrating part is that it could've been everything the Sorcerer is and more. Hell, just imagine how flufftastically awesome a mixture of Warlockery and Binders could be. Rather than the ever useless "Magic of Incarnum" (Wtf?) they should've put out "The Book of Bound...

Problem being the Fluff invocations were something of a straight jacket for say... a more fey oriented character. Few if any of the Warlocks abilities seemed overtly chaotic instead of overtly evil.

The failure of the Warlock is in its name and its abilities. The Warlock should've been given more generic names and invocations. Instead, they all tend to be themed around darkness and evil. The Warlock should've been the Sorcerer, and the various other "mages " (see Beguiler, Warmage, Dread...

Eh... you'll see. And that's all I have to say about that.