Search results

I mean the biggest thing is that there are cards that effectively take a player out of the game. If that happens to someone intricately connected to the current scenario you can completely derail things. For example, in the first Critical Role campaign if Percy had drawn from the deck and had...

It was Dancey's idea

Syderean is also excluded from the Black Flag SRD, which means the A5E remains the only 5e Aasimar in the CC.

I mean the notion of an alternate world from which Fairy creatures originate is hardly original to D&D. Even a lot of Feywild lore isn't exactly original to D&D, like Titania and Oberon.

Gosh I have booktuber brain.... I read this as 'combat involving sex' and was kind of concerned.

The warlock invocation 'Chains of Carceri' is also not in the new SRD, even renamed as far as I can see.

I notice that 'Feywild' as a proper noun is in this new SRD. So I guess that's not something WOTC seeks to protect as product identity.

I don't think we have anything to indicate what % of the planet the board game map depicts.

If I were going to port the Vale itself into the Realms/Faerun then I'd put it between Sembia and The Dales, near the Fallen Stars coast. That's where the map of Faerun most resembles the map from Conquest of Nerath, IMO. If I were going to put it anywhere in Realmspace I'd probably place it on...

How do you figure this?

Hrm. Some of these things might make for a good challenge run* but if I wanted a 1E feel then I wouldn't be playing 5E. *Gritty realism is one of those things that just feels ill-considered to me. Healing isn't the only thing a long rest does; the entire spell system is predicated on completing...

The same reason they play any game with character builds?

Okay but to be clear, you don't need to worry about that. For the purposes of publishing content, all you have to do is quote the citation that appears at the start of the CC SRD. Your own content can be released under any license you want, including the OGL, ORC, or no license at all.

It's not violence against humanoids. There are plenty of humanoids in the Monster Manual. The problem is attaching innate alignment to humanoid creatures.

Who gives a damn about that? My refrigerator isn't replacing people in creative industries.

'Enhanced' is a loaded word there. Just look at AI-'enhanced' movie remasters. Those extra pixels aren't really an enhancement when out of focus faces are sharpened and background details are lost in a slurry of color because of the algorithm getting confused.

We're delusional because we don't want to support products made using regurgitation machines trained on stolen data? Like what even is this take. Edit: The question isn't whether we'll never purchase any products that use AI... it's about WOTC products.

I've already been abstaining from WOTC products since the OGL Crisis so it would just reinforce my decision to keep supporting third party stuff. As long as it was also made by actual humans.

Meanwhile I'm playing a Quickstepper adept who regularly has 25 to 26 AC thanks to no-stamina Expert Tumble and 140 HP thanks to having 18 Con and the Hardy Adventurer Feat. In 12 levels I've almost gone down once to a 50+ damage critical.

5E really doesn't scale that high. Even a Wizard with wish isn't doing a fraction of what Strange and Scarlet Witch can.