Search results

They are not.

I don't believe it is yet, though we have clarified it on multiple social media avenues. You should also expect that in an effort to get you the clarity you desire, in the season 4 version of the ALPG, we will simply take the ability to rebuild your 5+ lvl PC away entirely. If you haven't used...

That is correct your original comment/argument is not our intent. The intent of the wording is to future proof future seasons. For example, lets say there is a future season that is underwater and we decide to make water genasi playable for everyone. The wording is intended to allow you to use...

All of the published adventures (Mine of Phandelver, Tyranny of Dragons, Rise of Tiamat, Princes of the Apocalypse, and Out of the Abyss) along with DDEX3-1 and DDEX3-2 from the expeditions part of the campaign, are all legal for homeplay.

I should clarify that I mean from Expeditions/Epics (aka the NPCs the Admins control). The original Zhent contact was Welsea Parenthe (female human (vampire) sorcerer) and she still appears in a limited number of places, but people likely Chaab and it tied 1-1 in well, so we changed it to him.

Pick one NPC from Season 1, 2, and 3 that is still alive and you would like to see more of in season 4; particularly if you want to learn more about their backstory.

White lies looks particularly interesting.

Interested in the final amount raised for Certs for Sam? You can find out the final tally here: https://www.facebook.com/ColdIronConventions/

I believe he wants all books to be legal for every setting in addition to the ones specific to an adventure/SO. (Use the SCAG and the EEPC)

My general move for a DM that gets a rule wrong is that assuming it doesn't result in character death, I let it slide and tell them where to find the rule when the game is over. People are less defensive if you don't call them out in front of all their players.

It shouldn't occur for every rest, only if you long rest in a faerzress-suffused area (not just anyway). Sounds like your DM was being particularly hard on you.

That might be more complicated than you think. Don't forget the in 5e you up all the xp and them multiply by a factor based on number of foes. Adding in player and then having the table fight two encounters at once is more than double the difficulty. Its possible to do the math to work it out...

I think its been explained to you by multiple people why the restriction is in place, so its not random no matter how much you say that phrase. I am sorry that you feel rules are arbitrary created for no other reason than to limited you. Hopefully we can do better in the future.

What's worse, saying we don't let these combos so you can't make that PC, or letting you make the PC, play it for a year or two and then say the new book makes that combo horrible, so we are taking away your PC? Its much easier to let things in than take them away.

This thread has ceased to be about anything related to the SCAG (especially since there is another SCAG thread). I recommend starting a new thread and taking this discussion over there.

That would be an error.

One note however, the Admins paid out of their own pockets to print most of the special certs (though the Baldman did pay for some of them at Gen Con). So its more the Admins looking to reward people who do special things for the campaign or unique players (I love to hand them to little kids or...

One of the (several) ideas behind unique certs is also to get stores and cons to invite the Admin/RC/LC to the store or con. We want to invite campaign staff to things so they know about them and feel welcome. I know some of the admins have traveled to cons/stores that were not near them because...

Correct and correct

Hmmm... where as I am more likely to accept big bribes!